Project success vs Project management success
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Big idea == | == Big idea == | ||
(1000 words) | (1000 words) | ||
| − | + | * Describe Project Management Success | |
| − | + | * Describe Project Success | |
| − | + | * Relate the successes to theories | |
| − | + | * What is the relationship between them | |
//Describe the tool, concept or theory and explain its purpose. The section should reflect the current state of the art on the topic | //Describe the tool, concept or theory and explain its purpose. The section should reflect the current state of the art on the topic | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Application == | == Application == | ||
(1000 words) | (1000 words) | ||
| − | + | * How to measure them | |
| − | + | * Examples? | |
//Provide guidance on how to use the tool, concept or theory and when it is applicable | //Provide guidance on how to use the tool, concept or theory and when it is applicable | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Limitations == | == Limitations == | ||
(500 words) | (500 words) | ||
| − | + | * When does it make sense to talk about project management/project success? Fex if a company is not project management driven | |
| − | + | * When is only one success enough? Do we always need to have both kinds of success? | |
//Critically reflect on the tool/concept/theory and its application context. What can it do, what can it not do? Under what circumstances should it be used, and when not? How does it compare to the “status quo” of the standards – is it part of it, or does it extent them? Discuss your article in the context of key readings / resources provided in class. Substantiate your claims with literature | //Critically reflect on the tool/concept/theory and its application context. What can it do, what can it not do? Under what circumstances should it be used, and when not? How does it compare to the “status quo” of the standards – is it part of it, or does it extent them? Discuss your article in the context of key readings / resources provided in class. Substantiate your claims with literature | ||
Revision as of 13:11, 8 February 2022
Contents |
Abstract
(500 words) //A brief summary of the key points of your article
Big idea
(1000 words)
- Describe Project Management Success
- Describe Project Success
- Relate the successes to theories
- What is the relationship between them
//Describe the tool, concept or theory and explain its purpose. The section should reflect the current state of the art on the topic
Application
(1000 words)
- How to measure them
- Examples?
//Provide guidance on how to use the tool, concept or theory and when it is applicable
Limitations
(500 words)
- When does it make sense to talk about project management/project success? Fex if a company is not project management driven
- When is only one success enough? Do we always need to have both kinds of success?
//Critically reflect on the tool/concept/theory and its application context. What can it do, what can it not do? Under what circumstances should it be used, and when not? How does it compare to the “status quo” of the standards – is it part of it, or does it extent them? Discuss your article in the context of key readings / resources provided in class. Substantiate your claims with literature
Annotated bibliography
Provide key references (3-10), where a reader can find additional information on the subject. The article MUST make appropriate references to the and reference material provided in class – either incorporating it as a source, or critically discussing aspects that are missing from it but covered by this article. Summarize and outline the relevance of each reference to the topic (around 100 words per reference). The bibliography is not counted in the suggested 3000 word target length of the article
