Robust decision making
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Histrory == | == Histrory == | ||
As with many technologies and scientific approaches, RDM has its origin from military activities. In the early 1980's, when the Cold War was reaching its terminating, the RAND corporation was using simulation models designed to predict the potential outcome of different strategies. (file:///Users/patricklaybourn/Downloads/1007261%20(1).pdf). At this stage of time, the methodology of RDM was not very well developed and RAND's predictions not very accurate. It was not until the early 1990's when the two RAND analysts Robert Lempert and Steven Popper further evolved the methodology framework in cooperation with RAND Computer Scientist Steve Bankes. The methods of RDM has been used ever since in an increasing manner on a wide range of different problematics of a very high degree of uncertainty including defense, flood risk management and climate change. (https://millennium-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/22-Robust-Decisionmaking.pdf) | As with many technologies and scientific approaches, RDM has its origin from military activities. In the early 1980's, when the Cold War was reaching its terminating, the RAND corporation was using simulation models designed to predict the potential outcome of different strategies. (file:///Users/patricklaybourn/Downloads/1007261%20(1).pdf). At this stage of time, the methodology of RDM was not very well developed and RAND's predictions not very accurate. It was not until the early 1990's when the two RAND analysts Robert Lempert and Steven Popper further evolved the methodology framework in cooperation with RAND Computer Scientist Steve Bankes. The methods of RDM has been used ever since in an increasing manner on a wide range of different problematics of a very high degree of uncertainty including defense, flood risk management and climate change. (https://millennium-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/22-Robust-Decisionmaking.pdf) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == RDM VS traditional risk management == | ||
+ | The use of a traditional risk management approach can prove very effective and often bring good results. These approaches are limited though, as they only work well when uncertainty is well addressed. The methodology of traditional risk accesment can have a number of different variations, but generally share a distinct pattern knowns as "predict-then-act". This approach follows the method illustrated in (picture 1). The approach first asks the question: "What will future conditions be?" and based in the information gained from this question, the next question: "What is the next near-term decision?" is asked. At the end, a final question in the form of a sensitivity analysis is asked: "How sensitive is the decision on the conditions?". However, the predict-then-act approach can prove valuable, it only holds its strength when the future is not changing and is not difficult to predict. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Contents: | Contents: | ||
Line 11: | Line 19: | ||
2. Applications | 2. Applications | ||
+ | 3. RDM VS traditional risk management | ||
Conditions of use | Conditions of use | ||
Robust decision making Framework | Robust decision making Framework |
Revision as of 14:58, 19 February 2022
Abstract
Managing and planing projects or portfolios includes making big decision often based either on a very limited knowledge base, or an uncertain future - or both. Dealing with a great set of unknowns and uncertainties requires a skill set to make decisions making outcomes robust enough to cope unexpected futures and new disrupting knowledge. This is where Robust decision making proves its importance. Robust decision making (RDM) is a framework for decision making that take the uncertainty of different futures into consideration and helps the decision maker to reach his/her end goals by making decisions strong enough to fit a wider range of future scenarios. Rather then questioning the different future scenarios, the methodology of RDM focuses on what actions can be done at the present in order to improve future stands. Dealing with project, program and portfolio management, RDM is a vital methodology frome the beginning where information can be limited, all the way to the end stage of a project where gained knowledge have the potential to disrupt previous made discions.
Histrory
As with many technologies and scientific approaches, RDM has its origin from military activities. In the early 1980's, when the Cold War was reaching its terminating, the RAND corporation was using simulation models designed to predict the potential outcome of different strategies. (file:///Users/patricklaybourn/Downloads/1007261%20(1).pdf). At this stage of time, the methodology of RDM was not very well developed and RAND's predictions not very accurate. It was not until the early 1990's when the two RAND analysts Robert Lempert and Steven Popper further evolved the methodology framework in cooperation with RAND Computer Scientist Steve Bankes. The methods of RDM has been used ever since in an increasing manner on a wide range of different problematics of a very high degree of uncertainty including defense, flood risk management and climate change. (https://millennium-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/22-Robust-Decisionmaking.pdf)
RDM VS traditional risk management
The use of a traditional risk management approach can prove very effective and often bring good results. These approaches are limited though, as they only work well when uncertainty is well addressed. The methodology of traditional risk accesment can have a number of different variations, but generally share a distinct pattern knowns as "predict-then-act". This approach follows the method illustrated in (picture 1). The approach first asks the question: "What will future conditions be?" and based in the information gained from this question, the next question: "What is the next near-term decision?" is asked. At the end, a final question in the form of a sensitivity analysis is asked: "How sensitive is the decision on the conditions?". However, the predict-then-act approach can prove valuable, it only holds its strength when the future is not changing and is not difficult to predict.
Contents:
1. History
2. Applications 3. RDM VS traditional risk management
Conditions of use Robust decision making Framework
3. Analytic tools
XLRM Framework
4. Limitations of Robust decision making 5. References
1. Vincent A. W. J. Marchau, Warren E. Walker, Pieter J. T. M. Bloemen, Steven W. Popper, "Desicion Making under Deep Uncertainty" 2. Lempert, Robert J; Popper, Steven W; Bankes, Steven C., "Robust Decision Making: Coping with Uncertainty",