Talk:Communication in Project Management
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Discussion") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Discussion | Discussion | ||
| + | |||
| + | KB1991, reviewer 1: | ||
| + | * The article is in general very well written both with regards to the grammar/spelling and the content. It is interesting to read. | ||
| + | * The abstract gives a good insight in the topic. | ||
| + | * Good with a lot of references to relevant sources. | ||
| + | * Nice with the figures, they were good and understandable. Would be nice if figure 1 was referred to in the text. | ||
| + | * Maybe some of the limitations could be evaluated. | ||
| + | * The bibliography is missing. | ||
| + | * I am not sure about what to comment on the length of it, since I’m not sure you are completely finished yet. But everything there is written now seems relevant from my point of view. | ||
Revision as of 14:51, 22 September 2015
Discussion
KB1991, reviewer 1:
- The article is in general very well written both with regards to the grammar/spelling and the content. It is interesting to read.
- The abstract gives a good insight in the topic.
- Good with a lot of references to relevant sources.
- Nice with the figures, they were good and understandable. Would be nice if figure 1 was referred to in the text.
- Maybe some of the limitations could be evaluated.
- The bibliography is missing.
- I am not sure about what to comment on the length of it, since I’m not sure you are completely finished yet. But everything there is written now seems relevant from my point of view.
