Talk:Early warning signals in project management
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* The language is overall good but there is in somepoint grammar mistakes in the text. Those are good to correct before the final handin. | * The language is overall good but there is in somepoint grammar mistakes in the text. Those are good to correct before the final handin. | ||
* The chapter "Main group of project problems" looks confusing that should made look different. | * The chapter "Main group of project problems" looks confusing that should made look different. | ||
| − | * References and bibliography are missing but they are probaply on their way...You have authors, so remember to also have the reference at the bottom. | + | * References and bibliography are missing but they are probaply on their way...You have authors writen in the text, so remember to also have the reference at the bottom. |
* The Barriers of identification looks nice. | * The Barriers of identification looks nice. | ||
* The article will also come more clear when it is finished, now it is still little bit unbalanced. | * The article will also come more clear when it is finished, now it is still little bit unbalanced. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Content== | ==Content== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The abstract tells in nicely all what is needed know about the article. | ||
*Some sentences are very long and it makes them confusing, for example '''"The complexity and uncertainly in the development of the process of the project make difficult to achieve the requirements adapted in the early stage of the project and not have a failure." ''' These kind should be written in more understandable way. | *Some sentences are very long and it makes them confusing, for example '''"The complexity and uncertainly in the development of the process of the project make difficult to achieve the requirements adapted in the early stage of the project and not have a failure." ''' These kind should be written in more understandable way. | ||
| + | * | ||
Revision as of 11:31, 22 September 2015
Kristine: It is an interesting subject you have chosen. I am not exactly certain I understand the specific tool you are talking about, but it might very well be much clearer in the final wiki feed. Remember to follow the structure as mentioned on the main page.
Feedback by S141506, Reviewer 1
I notice that you are not yet done with the article which is totally fine :) I will try to give you feedback on the material that you have the best way as I can.
Stucture
- I think it is good and chronologial structured. The pictures helps to understand the idea behind the text.
- The language is overall good but there is in somepoint grammar mistakes in the text. Those are good to correct before the final handin.
- The chapter "Main group of project problems" looks confusing that should made look different.
- References and bibliography are missing but they are probaply on their way...You have authors writen in the text, so remember to also have the reference at the bottom.
- The Barriers of identification looks nice.
- The article will also come more clear when it is finished, now it is still little bit unbalanced.
Content
- The abstract tells in nicely all what is needed know about the article.
- Some sentences are very long and it makes them confusing, for example "The complexity and uncertainly in the development of the process of the project make difficult to achieve the requirements adapted in the early stage of the project and not have a failure." These kind should be written in more understandable way.
