Scientific Management
Erikbajer99 (Talk | contribs) (→Principles) |
Erikbajer99 (Talk | contribs) (→Examples of practice) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
American factories? | American factories? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | Modern examples? | ||
== Criticism == | == Criticism == |
Revision as of 13:51, 15 February 2023
Contents |
Abstract
Scientific management is a management technique developed during the later stages of the industrial period, which focuses on systematising the work processes and quantifying the results.
Historical context
Scientific Management was created by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the last decades of the 19th century. This was a time of great industrial development in The United States when she was beginning to catch up to the production of the British Empire. Unlike today where most of society's value is created from service and more abstract sources, this is a period characterised by the development of the modern factories, with a clear division of labour, production quotas, and machinery controlled manually.
At Midvale Steel factory where he worked he observed that the daily output would almost always be significantly below what should be possible to accomplish. As he says: "Why is it, then, (...) that the great majority of our men are deliberately doing the opposite [of determined effort], and that even when the men have their best intentions their work is far from efficient?" [1] In his work on Scientific Management he made three observations, which are symptomatic of a larger problem in industries.
1) The fallacy that a material increase in the output of workers or machines would result in the firing of workers, as fewer men are able to do the same work.
2) Management in general is inefficient, making it necessary for workers to work slowly to protect their own self-interests.
3) The inefficient rule-of-thumb methods, which exist universally across all trades and waste resources and work hours. It is especially the last point that Taylor sought to remedy with his new method of management.
Principles
The single most important part of scientific management is what Taylor calls the "task idea". As far as is possible, all aspects of the worker's work is planned out at least one day in advance, and to avoid misunderstandings all of his instructions are written down. This planning is done by the joint effort of management and the worker. These instructions explain the worker's task and exactly by what means he is to accomplish the task. It also allots time for the task, and if the worker succeeds in finishing his task correctly and on time, he is to be rewarded with a 30% to 100% increase in his wage. However, if he fails in his task he should feel it directly by sharing in the loss of the factory. In this way, Taylor's management technique works with a carrot and a stick: He realised that giving workers a stake and incentive in their work made them more motivated to work efficiently, making it possible for wage-increases to be a win-win situation for management and workers alike. In other words, he seeks to create a symbiotic relationship.
The four core principles of Scientific Management can be summed up as follows.
1) That all aspects of the work be analysed critically and quantitively.
2) That workers be assigned the jobs that fit them the best.
3) That workers and manager corporate to maximise efficiency. Managers focus on managing, which includes the supervision of workers and results. It is the manager's job to make sure that the work is being done in the most efficient manner at all times.
4) Managers and workers work scientifically in their respective field, so that there is a clear division of labour. (1) (2)
Examples of practice
Soviet Union?
American factories?
Modern examples?
Criticism
Too rigid and arbitrary. Difficult to use outside of factories (i.e. service)
References
(1) The Principles of Scientific Management (1911) by Frederick Winslow Taylor // (2) https://www.mindtools.com/anx8725/frederick-taylor-and-scientific-management