Talk:Risk Identification
(Created page with "The language in the text is understandable and fluent with no errors on the spelling and grammar. It guides you through a number of definitions regarding risk and is relevant ...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The language in the text is understandable and fluent with no errors on the spelling and grammar. | The language in the text is understandable and fluent with no errors on the spelling and grammar. | ||
| + | |||
It guides you through a number of definitions regarding risk and is relevant for interested practitioners. | It guides you through a number of definitions regarding risk and is relevant for interested practitioners. | ||
| + | |||
It would probably be a good idea to make the spacing between the sections in “Definitions and Context” a bit bigger so it does not look like one long text. | It would probably be a good idea to make the spacing between the sections in “Definitions and Context” a bit bigger so it does not look like one long text. | ||
The article is missing some references relevant for the text. | The article is missing some references relevant for the text. | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | It also seems that the article has not yet been finished since there are two section at the end of the article with belonging under headings that has not been filled in. They do however seem relevant and interesting. Maybe a section about uncertainty could be relevant for the challenges of risk identification, it is only briefly mentioned. The article could also use some figures relevant to the Risk identification subject to make it more interesting and to emphasize points made in the article. | ||
Revision as of 14:01, 22 September 2015
The language in the text is understandable and fluent with no errors on the spelling and grammar.
It guides you through a number of definitions regarding risk and is relevant for interested practitioners.
It would probably be a good idea to make the spacing between the sections in “Definitions and Context” a bit bigger so it does not look like one long text. The article is missing some references relevant for the text.
It also seems that the article has not yet been finished since there are two section at the end of the article with belonging under headings that has not been filled in. They do however seem relevant and interesting. Maybe a section about uncertainty could be relevant for the challenges of risk identification, it is only briefly mentioned. The article could also use some figures relevant to the Risk identification subject to make it more interesting and to emphasize points made in the article.
