Talk:SCRUM Method
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss in your article. Maybe you have a particular aspect to look at, study in your article. | Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss in your article. Maybe you have a particular aspect to look at, study in your article. | ||
Reviewer 2 :Andkamp | Reviewer 2 :Andkamp | ||
| − | + | Formal aspects: | |
*Great interest on the method described on the article, with nice structure and points | *Great interest on the method described on the article, with nice structure and points | ||
| − | *Nice style, with precise sentences, but maybe it needs a little improvement in English as it has some minor mistakes | + | *Nice style, with precise sentences, but maybe it needs a little improvement in English as it has some minor mistakes (for example: insure the team working on highest valued features->to ensure that the team is...) |
*Nice figures, but better quality and explanation of them would be appreciated | *Nice figures, but better quality and explanation of them would be appreciated | ||
*Better structure as a wiki article would be preferable as there are no inter-wiki or other in text hyperlinks | *Better structure as a wiki article would be preferable as there are no inter-wiki or other in text hyperlinks | ||
*Do not know if the author has the right to use those images as there is no reference | *Do not know if the author has the right to use those images as there is no reference | ||
| − | *Pictures | + | *Pictures are nicely placed |
*Scrum method seems highly interesting for a practitioner, although no real implementation were presented in the article | *Scrum method seems highly interesting for a practitioner, although no real implementation were presented in the article | ||
| + | Content aspects: | ||
*Firmly related to the topic of project management | *Firmly related to the topic of project management | ||
*Appropriate length, although points 2.1.1-2.2.5 could be a little more extensive | *Appropriate length, although points 2.1.1-2.2.5 could be a little more extensive | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
*Could be connected with other articles through a see also section | *Could be connected with other articles through a see also section | ||
*Could add some real examples of implementation of this method | *Could add some real examples of implementation of this method | ||
| + | All in all it is a nice article that gave me some understanding of SCRUM method but the lack of bibliography and implementations,as well as the small extent of points 2.1.1-2.2.5 made me a have more questions than answers after reading it. | ||
Revision as of 16:38, 22 September 2015
Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss in your article. Maybe you have a particular aspect to look at, study in your article.
Reviewer 2 :Andkamp
Formal aspects:
- Great interest on the method described on the article, with nice structure and points
- Nice style, with precise sentences, but maybe it needs a little improvement in English as it has some minor mistakes (for example: insure the team working on highest valued features->to ensure that the team is...)
- Nice figures, but better quality and explanation of them would be appreciated
- Better structure as a wiki article would be preferable as there are no inter-wiki or other in text hyperlinks
- Do not know if the author has the right to use those images as there is no reference
- Pictures are nicely placed
- Scrum method seems highly interesting for a practitioner, although no real implementation were presented in the article
Content aspects:
- Firmly related to the topic of project management
- Appropriate length, although points 2.1.1-2.2.5 could be a little more extensive
- More things could be added in the introduction section
- One sided sources and only sites, no proper literature
- Could be connected with other articles through a see also section
- Could add some real examples of implementation of this method
All in all it is a nice article that gave me some understanding of SCRUM method but the lack of bibliography and implementations,as well as the small extent of points 2.1.1-2.2.5 made me a have more questions than answers after reading it.
