Talk:Earned Value Management
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Review 3, s150621 | Review 3, s150621 | ||
| + | |||
• This article is written with good language | • This article is written with good language | ||
| + | |||
• The use of links to other articles, as for example WBS, is nice | • The use of links to other articles, as for example WBS, is nice | ||
| + | |||
• Your references look good | • Your references look good | ||
| + | |||
• The article enumerates many terms, and when reading through it can be a little bit too much of this. A suggestion is to have some more explanatory text in between? | • The article enumerates many terms, and when reading through it can be a little bit too much of this. A suggestion is to have some more explanatory text in between? | ||
| + | |||
• The figures are effective, but could give even better understanding with more explanation. For example, the figures can be used in the text for better explanation? | • The figures are effective, but could give even better understanding with more explanation. For example, the figures can be used in the text for better explanation? | ||
| + | |||
• The example is nice, but could advantageously be more comprehensive. For me, I think it would be better if the whole example was described together in the end. This way, the reader gets to see the whole picture. An alternative is to have an extra example before you start the discussion? | • The example is nice, but could advantageously be more comprehensive. For me, I think it would be better if the whole example was described together in the end. This way, the reader gets to see the whole picture. An alternative is to have an extra example before you start the discussion? | ||
| + | |||
• The comparison with Tradition Cost Management in the end is good, and also the paragraph with Limitations. As your article is a bit short, I think you advantageously can extend the discussion. | • The comparison with Tradition Cost Management in the end is good, and also the paragraph with Limitations. As your article is a bit short, I think you advantageously can extend the discussion. | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 22 September 2015
Mette: Very nice topic choice that fits the requirements for this type of article. Look forward to reading more about this tool.
Review 3, s150621
• This article is written with good language
• The use of links to other articles, as for example WBS, is nice
• Your references look good
• The article enumerates many terms, and when reading through it can be a little bit too much of this. A suggestion is to have some more explanatory text in between?
• The figures are effective, but could give even better understanding with more explanation. For example, the figures can be used in the text for better explanation?
• The example is nice, but could advantageously be more comprehensive. For me, I think it would be better if the whole example was described together in the end. This way, the reader gets to see the whole picture. An alternative is to have an extra example before you start the discussion?
• The comparison with Tradition Cost Management in the end is good, and also the paragraph with Limitations. As your article is a bit short, I think you advantageously can extend the discussion.
