Talk:Location Based Scheduling
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Review 1, s140046 | Review 1, s140046 | ||
| − | # The introduction works very well. | + | # The introduction works very well. '''Thanks''' |
| − | # Good use of internal references(wikilinks), even within our own wikipage. | + | # Good use of internal references(wikilinks), even within our own wikipage. '''Thanks''' |
| − | # Intensive commercials when clicking on the Empire state picture are confusing | + | # Intensive commercials when clicking on the Empire state picture are confusing '''Fixed''' |
| − | # Picture text in figure 3: Consider to use short/long instead of slow and fast | + | # Picture text in figure 3: Consider to use short/long instead of slow and fast '''Good point. This is changed''' |
# Great description of LB activitity-linkages with fine exmples. Please add a reference to underline that the used terms of the linkages are the formal ones. | # Great description of LB activitity-linkages with fine exmples. Please add a reference to underline that the used terms of the linkages are the formal ones. | ||
| − | # It would be great if you describe how the duration of the tasks are defined. At least include it before you suggest to optimize by adding resources in section “Control of resources and Linkages”. | + | # It would be great if you describe how the duration of the tasks are defined. At least include it before you suggest to optimize by adding resources in section “Control of resources and Linkages”. '''Good point. This is incorporated''' |
| − | # You are on the 3000 words limit however I feel that you can articulate how the slope of the flowlines are determined better. The pace/tact are (often) determined quantitatively where with CPM it is often qualitatively. With LBS the schedule is based on actual numbers and not personal experience. | + | # You are on the 3000 words limit however I feel that you can articulate how the slope of the flowlines are determined better. The pace/tact are (often) determined quantitatively where with CPM it is often qualitatively. With LBS the schedule is based on actual numbers and not personal experience. '''Good point. This is incorporated in section "Flow-Line Diagram''' |
| − | # In general a well written article with a good structure. The tables works out very well. | + | # In general a well written article with a good structure. The tables works out very well.'''Thanks''' |
| − | # If you should improve on the taxonomic level I would argue to focus more on the critical reflections and perhaps shorten the LB activitity-linkages section. | + | # If you should improve on the taxonomic level I would argue to focus more on the critical reflections and perhaps shorten the LB activitity-linkages section. '''The critical reflections section has been improved''' |
| − | # Note that references must include a brief summary of each source. | + | # Note that references must include a brief summary of each source. '''Fixed''' |
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| − | • The overall impression is that the article is clear and straight forward, with many good figures and tables | + | • The overall impression is that the article is clear and straight forward, with many good figures and tables '''Thanks''' |
| − | • All together very good language | + | • All together very good language '''Thanks''' |
| − | • The table with types of activity linkage is very good, with both description and a figure | + | • The table with types of activity linkage is very good, with both description and a figure '''Thanks''' |
| − | • Very good with links to other articles, like for example WBS | + | • Very good with links to other articles, like for example WBS '''Thanks''' |
| − | • The figures are very nice, but a suggestion is to add the sources | + | • The figures are very nice, but a suggestion is to add the sources '''Thanks''' |
| − | • The abstract is very good, with both a short example and a comparison. A suggestion is to move the first two sentences in the second paragraph over to the abstract, so that you describe some of the content of the article in the abstract rather than in the introduction to the method. | + | • The abstract is very good, with both a short example and a comparison. A suggestion is to move the first two sentences in the second paragraph over to the abstract, so that you describe some of the content of the article in the abstract rather than in the introduction to the method. '''Thanks. I have not moved the two sentesces. I think the are best in the abstract''' |
==Review of Sorth90 (Rasmus Sorth-Olsen s117422), Reviewer 3== | ==Review of Sorth90 (Rasmus Sorth-Olsen s117422), Reviewer 3== | ||
| − | * The article has the necessary references and sources that support its content | + | * The article has the necessary references and sources that support its content '''Thanks''' |
| − | * Most studens at DTU would benefit from reading the article in connection with upcoming projects | + | * Most studens at DTU would benefit from reading the article in connection with upcoming projects '''Thanks''' |
| − | * It was must educational to read the article "Location Based Schedulin" | + | * It was must educational to read the article "Location Based Schedulin" '''Thanks''' |
| − | * The article in written in a clear way. | + | * The article in written in a clear way. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * The article shows that you know and have familiarized yourself with the subject before writing the article. | + | * The article shows that you know and have familiarized yourself with the subject before writing the article. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * The article covers some good models. | + | * The article covers some good models. '''Thanks''' |
Abstract: | Abstract: | ||
| − | * From the abstract, the article seems interesting. | + | * From the abstract, the article seems interesting. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * Good description of Location Based Schedulin. | + | * Good description of Location Based Schedulin. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * Quick and precise. | + | * Quick and precise. '''Thanks''' |
About Location Based Scheduling: | About Location Based Scheduling: | ||
| − | * Well, that section is divided into bullet points. This makes it easier to read. | + | * Well, that section is divided into bullet points. This makes it easier to read. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * It would be good with an example. "time / place-diagram" and "Flow-line diagram". | + | * It would be good with an example. "time / place-diagram" and "Flow-line diagram". '''Correct - I have made a reference to a Figure''' |
| − | * Really good. The section is supported by the figure. | + | * Really good. The section is supported by the figure. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * Figure 2 is too small. You can not read what it says. | + | * Figure 2 is too small. You can not read what it says. '''Fixed''' |
Flow-Line Method: | Flow-Line Method: | ||
| − | * Well, that section is divided into bullet points. This makes it easier to read. | + | * Well, that section is divided into bullet points. This makes it easier to read. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * Give the sections numbers. In this way, we know that the following sections are subsections. | + | * Give the sections numbers. In this way, we know that the following sections are subsections. '''Thanks''' |
Flow-Line Diagram: | Flow-Line Diagram: | ||
| − | * Really good. The section is supported by Figure 3. | + | * Really good. The section is supported by Figure 3. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * Figure 3 is too small. You can not read what it says. | + | * Figure 3 is too small. You can not read what it says. '''Fixed''' |
Identifying the locations: | Identifying the locations: | ||
| − | * Really good. The section is supported by Figure 4. | + | * Really good. The section is supported by Figure 4. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * Figure 4 is too small. You can not read what it says. | + | * Figure 4 is too small. You can not read what it says. '''Fixed''' |
Optimization using flow-line diagram: | Optimization using flow-line diagram: | ||
| − | * Very short description. The section to be deepened. | + | * Very short description. The section to be deepened. '''Point taken. The section has be elaborated more.''' |
Location-Based activity-linkages: | Location-Based activity-linkages: | ||
| − | * Well, that section is divided into bullet points. This makes it easier to read. | + | * Well, that section is divided into bullet points. This makes it easier to read. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * Types of activity-linkages. The table is really good. The figures are a little small, but you understand the principles. | + | * Types of activity-linkages. The table is really good. The figures are a little small, but you understand the principles. '''Thanks''' |
Control of resources and linkages: | Control of resources and linkages: | ||
LBS/Flow Line Diagram compared with CPM/Gantt Chart: | LBS/Flow Line Diagram compared with CPM/Gantt Chart: | ||
| − | * Figure 16 is unmanageable. | + | * Figure 16 is unmanageable. '''I have tried to make it better''' |
Current State of Art: | Current State of Art: | ||
| − | * Well section. | + | * Well section. '''Thanks''' |
| − | * What's the competitors enter the LBS? | + | * What's the competitors enter the LBS? '''I don't understand the point made?''' |
Kritisk Reflects: | Kritisk Reflects: | ||
| − | * Well, that section is supported by sources. | + | * Well, that section is supported by sources. '''Thanks''' |
Latest revision as of 16:34, 27 September 2015
Mette: I like your idea. Remember to keep the structure for a "method article". You write about the benefits of using LBS instead of CPM, so maybe you could discuss why and where LBC is a better tool.
Review 1, s140046
- The introduction works very well. Thanks
- Good use of internal references(wikilinks), even within our own wikipage. Thanks
- Intensive commercials when clicking on the Empire state picture are confusing Fixed
- Picture text in figure 3: Consider to use short/long instead of slow and fast Good point. This is changed
- Great description of LB activitity-linkages with fine exmples. Please add a reference to underline that the used terms of the linkages are the formal ones.
- It would be great if you describe how the duration of the tasks are defined. At least include it before you suggest to optimize by adding resources in section “Control of resources and Linkages”. Good point. This is incorporated
- You are on the 3000 words limit however I feel that you can articulate how the slope of the flowlines are determined better. The pace/tact are (often) determined quantitatively where with CPM it is often qualitatively. With LBS the schedule is based on actual numbers and not personal experience. Good point. This is incorporated in section "Flow-Line Diagram
- In general a well written article with a good structure. The tables works out very well.Thanks
- If you should improve on the taxonomic level I would argue to focus more on the critical reflections and perhaps shorten the LB activitity-linkages section. The critical reflections section has been improved
- Note that references must include a brief summary of each source. Fixed
Review 2, s150621
• The overall impression is that the article is clear and straight forward, with many good figures and tables Thanks
• All together very good language Thanks
• The table with types of activity linkage is very good, with both description and a figure Thanks
• Very good with links to other articles, like for example WBS Thanks
• The figures are very nice, but a suggestion is to add the sources Thanks
• The abstract is very good, with both a short example and a comparison. A suggestion is to move the first two sentences in the second paragraph over to the abstract, so that you describe some of the content of the article in the abstract rather than in the introduction to the method. Thanks. I have not moved the two sentesces. I think the are best in the abstract
[edit] Review of Sorth90 (Rasmus Sorth-Olsen s117422), Reviewer 3
- The article has the necessary references and sources that support its content Thanks
- Most studens at DTU would benefit from reading the article in connection with upcoming projects Thanks
- It was must educational to read the article "Location Based Schedulin" Thanks
- The article in written in a clear way. Thanks
- The article shows that you know and have familiarized yourself with the subject before writing the article. Thanks
- The article covers some good models. Thanks
Abstract:
- From the abstract, the article seems interesting. Thanks
- Good description of Location Based Schedulin. Thanks
- Quick and precise. Thanks
About Location Based Scheduling:
- Well, that section is divided into bullet points. This makes it easier to read. Thanks
- It would be good with an example. "time / place-diagram" and "Flow-line diagram". Correct - I have made a reference to a Figure
- Really good. The section is supported by the figure. Thanks
- Figure 2 is too small. You can not read what it says. Fixed
Flow-Line Method:
- Well, that section is divided into bullet points. This makes it easier to read. Thanks
- Give the sections numbers. In this way, we know that the following sections are subsections. Thanks
Flow-Line Diagram:
- Really good. The section is supported by Figure 3. Thanks
- Figure 3 is too small. You can not read what it says. Fixed
Identifying the locations:
- Really good. The section is supported by Figure 4. Thanks
- Figure 4 is too small. You can not read what it says. Fixed
Optimization using flow-line diagram:
- Very short description. The section to be deepened. Point taken. The section has be elaborated more.
Location-Based activity-linkages:
- Well, that section is divided into bullet points. This makes it easier to read. Thanks
- Types of activity-linkages. The table is really good. The figures are a little small, but you understand the principles. Thanks
Control of resources and linkages:
LBS/Flow Line Diagram compared with CPM/Gantt Chart:
- Figure 16 is unmanageable. I have tried to make it better
Current State of Art:
- Well section. Thanks
- What's the competitors enter the LBS? I don't understand the point made?
Kritisk Reflects:
- Well, that section is supported by sources. Thanks
