Assessment of stakeholders (analysis)
(→Brainstorm, identify and document stakeholders) |
(→Categorize and analyze their interests and potential) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
=== Categorize and analyze their interests and potential === | === Categorize and analyze their interests and potential === | ||
+ | |||
+ | After stakeholders have been identified, documented and brainstormed upon, it is crucial to classify and evaluate their interests and potential effects on the project. This entails reviewing how the project's objectives correspond with the aspirations, expectations, and concerns of the stakeholders. By obtaining this information one can more easily comprehend their potential impact on the project and how to engage with them effectively. | ||
+ | |||
=== Evaluate stakeholder influence and prioritize === | === Evaluate stakeholder influence and prioritize === | ||
=== Plan, implement, and communicate === | === Plan, implement, and communicate === |
Revision as of 18:52, 8 April 2023
Developed by Carl Bygum Knudsen
Contents |
Abstract
The assessment of stakeholders is a crucial element of any project or business strategy. It involves identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the stakeholders’ interests, potential, and influence to determine the best way to manage and interact with them. Stakeholder assessment, in essence, is the categorization and classification of stakeholders in a way that clarifies how each individual stakeholder should be managed.
This wiki article provides a comprehensive overview of the assessment of stakeholders, including a discussion of the key steps involved, some of the tools and techniques used, and the best practices. The article initially explains and discusses the importance of stakeholder assessment in project management.
The critical steps of the assessment process will be discussed followed by the different tools and techniques used to assess stakeholders at each step. The article includes and briefly describe tools that assists the overall process of stakeholder analysis such as brainstorming, various mapping tools, surveys and interviews, and other relevant data collection tools and techniques. The wiki article will touch upon these subjects but focus more on the tools that allow for the assessment of stakeholders such as stakeholder mapping and power-interest grid.
Finally, the wiki article will outline some of the potential challenges and risks associated with stakeholder assessment. These include the potential for conflict of interest, unequal access to resources, and difficulty in managing stakeholders with differing interests. In general, this article provides a comprehensive overview for project managers to understand and implement of the assessment of stakeholders and the key steps, tools, and best practices involved.
Assessment Process
Introduction
Stakeholder assessment is a part of the larger and complex task of stakeholder management. It is the initial process in stakeholder management of providing a clear understanding of stakeholders' interests and expectations, while stakeholder management is the ongoing process of engaging and meeting the expectations of stakeholders. To gain a thorough understanding of stakeholder assessment, it is crucial to explain the steps of stakeholder assessment in detail.
Brainstorm, identify and document stakeholders
The process of identifying the stakeholders in your project and how they could affect its goals is known as stakeholder identification. Identification of stakeholders is important to any project. This helps ensure that all individuals or groups affected by the project are identified and that their needs and expectations are taken into account, doing this right sets the project up for success.
The process of identifying stakeholders is an ongoing process, and it is a good idea to identify the stakeholders and manage them throughout the project life cycle as the stakeholder environment may be subject to change. Projects are usually highly complex and challenging in the beginning and it requires a lot of effort to determine who is going to be impacted by the project.
A good identification process starts with reviewing key documents. It is important to review all relevant project documents, such as project plans, requirements documents, business cases, and stakeholder registers from previous projects. By analyzing these documents, you can identify stakeholders who have been involved in similar projects and forecast their potential impact on the current endeavour. Additionally, reviewing organizational policies, regulations, and guidelines can help identify stakeholders who may have legal or regulatory requirements that need to be taken into account. To avoid misunderstandings, it is important to have a clear definition of stakeholders from the beginning of the project (Bendtsen et al. 2021).
However, projects usually have some sort of uniqueness and may similar projects may not have been carried out before. To find out which stakeholders your project will impact, using brainstorming as a tool to obtain this can be a great starting point. A brainstorming session is bringing together a group of individuals with different perspectives and experiences in order to generate ideas and perspectives on stakeholders that might be essential to the project, which can then be further analyzed and prioritized. Transparency and inclusiveness are important in these sessions, as they will allow the participants to speak more freely. Moreover, having a facilitator to guide the discussion will help maintain the focus.
Reviewing key documents and trying to utilize learnings from previous projects to one's advantage is a great first step. By using brainstorming techniques in collaboration with stakeholder mapping, project charter, and stakeholder register, you can create a comprehensive stakeholder identification plan that will set your project up for success.
Categorize and analyze their interests and potential
After stakeholders have been identified, documented and brainstormed upon, it is crucial to classify and evaluate their interests and potential effects on the project. This entails reviewing how the project's objectives correspond with the aspirations, expectations, and concerns of the stakeholders. By obtaining this information one can more easily comprehend their potential impact on the project and how to engage with them effectively.
Evaluate stakeholder influence and prioritize
Plan, implement, and communicate
Tools and Techniques
Stakeholder Mapping
Power-Interest Grid
Other tools; Stakeholder Analysis, survey, interviews, brainstorming, data collection
Best Practices
Company examples on stakeholder assessment, stakeholder management and power dynamics
Challenges and Risks
Conflict of Interest
Bendtsen et al 2020: Clear definition of stakeholders and how to determine power and influence?
Unequal Access to Resources
Difficulty Managing Diverse Interests
Conclusion
Bibliography
References (In progress - may be subject to change)
1. Bendtsen, E. B., Clausen, L. P. W., & Hansen, S. F. (2021). A review of the state-of-the-art for stakeholder analysis with regard to environmental management and regulation. Journal of Environmental Management, 279.
2. Freeman, R,E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman
3. Cleland, David. 1994. Project Management: Strategic Design and Implementation. McGraw-Hill Inc.
4. Bonke, S., & Winch, G. (2002). Project Stakeholder Mapping: Analyzing the Interests of Project Stakeholders. In D. P. Slevin, D. I. Cleland, & J. K. Pinto (Eds.), The Frontiers of Project Management Research (pp. 385-405). Project Management Institute, PMI.
5. Bourne, L., & Walker, D. H. T. (2005). Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management Decision, 43(5), 649–660.
6. Slabá, M. (n.d.). Stakeholder profile and stakeholder mapping of SMEs.
7. RIAHI, Y. (2017). Project stakeholders: Analysis and Management Processes. International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 4(3), 39–45.
8. CRAWLEY MIT – NASA STAKEHOLDER MAP (ref to found)
9. Brugha, R., Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning, 239–246.