Talk:Critical reflection on Project Portfolio Management software: Difference between revisions

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Val review ==
== Val review ==


*
 
 
===Content aspects===
 
*"Even though Cooper R. argues that poor tools are better than no tools I would argue that a tool that distorts the result is worse."?
*"From 1990 - 1999 IT investments rose from 9% - 22%" % of what?
*Conclusion?
 
===Formal aspects===
 
*use of references
*figure 1 is missing
*hard to see the legend/caption in figure 2
*"Executives" or "executives? You should choose one of the writting
 
===Grammar and Spelling===
*deferral instead of deferal
*" As Lee Merkhofer consulting states. It is not beneficial for software developers to make advanced PPM software targeting niche markets."?
*"The bottom line is that even though PPM decision making software is adapted by many companies it fail"s" to gain user acceptance."

Revision as of 15:08, 25 November 2014

Val review

Content aspects

  • "Even though Cooper R. argues that poor tools are better than no tools I would argue that a tool that distorts the result is worse."?
  • "From 1990 - 1999 IT investments rose from 9% - 22%" % of what?
  • Conclusion?

Formal aspects

  • use of references
  • figure 1 is missing
  • hard to see the legend/caption in figure 2
  • "Executives" or "executives? You should choose one of the writting

Grammar and Spelling

  • deferral instead of deferal
  • " As Lee Merkhofer consulting states. It is not beneficial for software developers to make advanced PPM software targeting niche markets."?
  • "The bottom line is that even though PPM decision making software is adapted by many companies it fail"s" to gain user acceptance."