Talk:Implementing KPIs
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Feedback - Char) |
(→Feedback - Char) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*Nice language | *Nice language | ||
*Good and clear structure | *Good and clear structure | ||
| − | * Code the references | + | * Code the references. |
* The length is good. You cover the chosen subject. | * The length is good. You cover the chosen subject. | ||
Revision as of 17:23, 25 November 2014
Feedback - Char
FORMAL ASPECTS
- Good critical approach
- Nice language
- Good and clear structure
- Code the references.
- The length is good. You cover the chosen subject.
CONTENT ASPECTS Introduction
- The introduction is very catchy
So, what does the literature say Comparable standards
- You could add a more history view on the KPI in order to create and understanding of he term. When where the term used first, develop etc.
- You could create a table with the different standards, their description, KIPs and diversity. This will create a overview of the different standards and make it easier for the reader to compare them.
Additional related material
- Look at CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration). This is a process that determines/viewer (by some kind of measurement) maturity of different processes and thereby show where there need to be improved
The setup How to define KPIs
- Very good discussion about the number of measurements.
Scorecards and Dashboards
- Add figure of the Scorecards and Dashboards
- Explain what parameters the two setups are containing in order to create overview and how they are using the information and data.
- You could expand your description about the differences between the scorecards and dashboards. The whole section is a bit short.
Discussion Strength and weaknesses
- Good discussion. You are covering many different perspectives.
Implementation advice
- The examples create a good overview and understanding.
