Designing Effective Project Organisations

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(The strong owner framework)
Line 52: Line 52:
  
 
====Owner project capabilities====
 
====Owner project capabilities====
 +
 +
 +
==Annotated bibliography==
 +
 +
1. Peter Fewings, "''Construction Project Management''", Taylor & Francis 2005. ISBN 0-203-00698-4 Master e-book ISBN.
 +
 +
The book focuses on project management in construction, and has several chapters dedicated to teamwork and project management, but especially chapter 7 is very useful for this topic, and is therefore highly recommended. Here different teamwork concepts are presented, and different studies are presented and commented on.
 +
 +
 +
2. Stephen Emmitt and Christopher Gorse, "''Communication in Construction Teams''", Taylor & Francis 2007. ISBN10: 0–415–36619–4 (hbk).
 +
 +
This book focuses primarily on the communication and the importance of effective communication in a construction team. It states that without good communication finishing a construction process is almost impossible, and that focus on the important of good communication has been far too low and far too little research has been made on this topic. Therefore, this book make research of how the communication plays a role in teamworking.
 +
 +
 +
3. Værdibyg, "''Etablering af Samarbejde''", Værdiskabende Byggeproces 2012.<ref name=Værdibyg1, <i>Værdibyg (2012), "Etablering af Samarbejde", ''Online Handbook of Establishment of Collaboration''. Retrieved 19.06.2017, [http://www.vaerdibyg.dk/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=127&tmpl=component&format=raw&Itemid=133 Available Online] </ref>
 +
 +
This handbook is about establishment of collaboration and has been prepared by a collaboration between various participants in the building industry of Denmark (e.g. Dansk Byggeri, Foreningen for Rådgivende Ingeniører, Danske Arkitekt Virksomheder etc.). The handbook focuses on the phase shift from project work to execution, and different tools to obtain a good relationship and collaboration is described.
 +
 +
 +
4. Værdibyg, "''Samarbejde og Kommunikation i Renoveringsprojekter''", Værdiskabende Byggeproces 2015.<ref name=Værdibyg2, <i>Værdibyg (2015), "Samarbejde og Kommunikation i Renoveringsprojekter", ''Online Handbook of Collaboration and Communication in Renovating Projects''. Retrieved 19.06.2017, [http://www.vaerdibyg.dk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=32&child=32&id=226&Itemid=171 Available Online] </ref>
 +
 +
This handbook is like the above reference about tools to achieve a good teamwork. It is developed by the same participants; the only difference is that this guidance focuses on the challenges in renovating projects.
 +
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
  
 
<references />
 
<references />

Revision as of 06:39, 22 June 2017

This article will present and discuss the following chapters:

This article will first present the most relevant terms and definitions within the chapters. Afterwards some of the models and theories will be analysed and discussed, in addition literature studies will also be carried out to support the article. Lastly, some recommendations or reflections upon the topics will be conducted.

When designing effective project organisations a lot of different factors and actors have to be considered, for instance the responsibilities and management options of the client. How to organise through the life cycle of a project, determination of the organisational breakdown structure and creating optimal and efficient project teams.

Contents

The implementation of the project management concept

Figure 1: The implementation of the project management concept.[1]


Winch has presented three different actors within construction management; The client, the project manager and the resource-bases. The resource bases provide skills required to execute different task within the project. Paul Gaddis has characterised the project manager as the 'manager in the middle', in this context it is between the client and the resource bases. The purpose of the project manager is to act as an interface between the client's desires and the capabilities of the resource bases. In addition the project manager has the responsibility to coordinate during the project life cycle in order to fulfil the client's desires and goals. Across different industries an extensive review of research regarding the application of the project management concept has identified a range of applications, which is presented in figure 1. The distinction between the applications depend on whether the manager of the resource-bases have more control or the project manager has more control. When resource-base managers are in complete control, or the project manager has a liaison role, then it is defined as a functional organisation. Finally, when the project manager is in complete control, including the authority to hire staff directly, then it is defined as a cell organisation. Therefore, according to the concept the more control the project manager has, the organisation will go from functional to a cell organisation.

Winch states that, as the project progresses so does the project organisation, the different responsibilities of the resource-bases and project managers become more clearly, the different responsibilities are illustrated on figure 2.
Figure 2: Different responsibilities that the project and resource-base managers have.[1]

The responsibilities of the client

The client assembles a coalition of firms to execute the project mission, and the contractual documents between the firms define the project organisation structure. However the client possess important responsibilities towards leading the project coalition, the responsibilities are:

  • Promoter – defining the need for the project and ensuring that it meets that need;
  • Financier – obtaining the capital required to finance the project;
  • Decision-maker – making those decisions required to push the project through the life cycle;
  • Recruiter – mobilising the most appropriate and capable firms to realise the project. This is a legal obligation under European health and safety legislation.

It is difficult to fulfil all the responsibilities and usually not all the clients have the proper organisational capabilities. The need for these organisational capabilities has led to a development of firms who provide project management services. These firms are often called 'project managers', but in practice, they do not manage and provide co-ordination between resource bases, instead they help the client fulfil its responsibilities towards the project coalition.

Organising the project through the life cycle

Henry Mintzberg has characterised project management as 'adminstrative adhocracies', therefore he suggest that it is an adhocracy with bureaucratic tendencies. Furthermore, project organisation is not constant through the project life cycle but dynamic. In the early stages of the life cycle the levels of uncertainty are very high, whereas the levels of uncertainty reduce towards zero as the project nears its completion. Another aspect is that project organisation grows in size through the life cycle. In the beginning, the work is usually done by a few highly skilled people, when the project moves on site a lot of less skilled people come into play. On the biggest projects, thousands of people are working concurrently both on site and off site with the design and providing resources to execute the project. The changes in size and level of uncertainty that the project organisation needs to adjust to lead to important changes within the organisation, Winch describes the changes as:[1]


"..as it moves from divergent to convergent iterative information processing, and on through reciprocal flows to much more of a pooled co-ordination with tasks running in parallel through the life cycle."


According to Winch a basic tenet of designing effective organisations is: "that organisations facing high levels of uncertainty need to be relatively adhocratic in organisation and cannot be large, while organisations facing lower levels of uncertainty can be both relatively bureaucratic and large.[1]

The strong owner framework

This section will present some of the most relevant definitions and points from Winch and Leiringer's paper regarding owner project capabilities for infrastructure development. First the paper defines the 'strong owner' and the 'owner project capabilities'. Secondly, a framework has been developed from reviews of "existing literature complemented by pilot empirical research which provides the basis for a research agenda on the role of the owner of the infrastructure assets in achieving high performance on transportation infrastructure projects". Finally, the paper suggest that the generated framework is applicable to other major projects and programmes.[2]

In the paper some case studies has identified the importance of a 'strong owner' as a dimension of project success. However, Winch and Leiringer state that the case studies only discuss the legal and contractual matters, and therefore the owner can be described as a mere contract-giver and have no relation regarding stakeholder management, institutional context and project strategy. Winch and Leiringer defines the success as: "in terms of the achievement of the expected benefits of the investment project for the owner rather than the broader set of criteria encompassing other stakeholder interests (Cooke-Davies, 2002; DeWit, 1988)."

Project and commercial capabilities

Winch and Leiringer differentiate between dynamic and operational capabilities. Operational capabilities are the ability of the organisation to utilise its resource bases to provide effectively and efficiently goods and services to its customers. Dynamic capabilities, are the ability "of an organisation to purposefully create, extend, or modify the resource base”. Winch and Leiringer state that, when a purchasing firm has a dynamic capability it may only be an operational capability for a supplying firm. Therefore, most of the project-based firms have operational capabilities, whereas the purchasing owner organisation almost always will have dynamic capabilities because they extend the resource-base of the organisation.

Owner project capabilities

Annotated bibliography

1. Peter Fewings, "Construction Project Management", Taylor & Francis 2005. ISBN 0-203-00698-4 Master e-book ISBN.

The book focuses on project management in construction, and has several chapters dedicated to teamwork and project management, but especially chapter 7 is very useful for this topic, and is therefore highly recommended. Here different teamwork concepts are presented, and different studies are presented and commented on.


2. Stephen Emmitt and Christopher Gorse, "Communication in Construction Teams", Taylor & Francis 2007. ISBN10: 0–415–36619–4 (hbk).

This book focuses primarily on the communication and the importance of effective communication in a construction team. It states that without good communication finishing a construction process is almost impossible, and that focus on the important of good communication has been far too low and far too little research has been made on this topic. Therefore, this book make research of how the communication plays a role in teamworking.


3. Værdibyg, "Etablering af Samarbejde", Værdiskabende Byggeproces 2012.[3]

This handbook is about establishment of collaboration and has been prepared by a collaboration between various participants in the building industry of Denmark (e.g. Dansk Byggeri, Foreningen for Rådgivende Ingeniører, Danske Arkitekt Virksomheder etc.). The handbook focuses on the phase shift from project work to execution, and different tools to obtain a good relationship and collaboration is described.


4. Værdibyg, "Samarbejde og Kommunikation i Renoveringsprojekter", Værdiskabende Byggeproces 2015.[4]

This handbook is like the above reference about tools to achieve a good teamwork. It is developed by the same participants; the only difference is that this guidance focuses on the challenges in renovating projects.


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Winch, Graham M., 2010, "Managing Construction Projects, 2nd edition"
  2. Winch Graham, Roine Leiringer, 2016, "Owner project capabilities for infrastructure development: A review and development of the “strong owner” concept"
  3. Værdibyg (2012), "Etablering af Samarbejde", Online Handbook of Establishment of Collaboration. Retrieved 19.06.2017, Available Online
  4. Værdibyg (2015), "Samarbejde og Kommunikation i Renoveringsprojekter", Online Handbook of Collaboration and Communication in Renovating Projects. Retrieved 19.06.2017, Available Online
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox