Talk:The Sprint Methodology in Agile Project Management
(Created page with "'''Text clarity''' The text sounds coherent '''Language''' Can be improved - e.g. what do you mean by "..ensures that the project continues being rentable?" '''Descr...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Language''' Can be improved - e.g. what do you mean by "..ensures that the project continues being rentable?" | '''Language''' Can be improved - e.g. what do you mean by "..ensures that the project continues being rentable?" | ||
| − | '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good, but consider adding a brief one liner explaining | + | '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good, but consider adding a brief one liner explaining what exactly agile project management is. Also, see my comment about risk management and how it fits in Agile Project Management under "General" |
'''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed and the article structure is outlined, but who is your reader? Is it the project manager? Does this apply article apply to a specific industry? | '''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed and the article structure is outlined, but who is your reader? Is it the project manager? Does this apply article apply to a specific industry? | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
'''References''' References seem valid, but research how you can appropriately reference the mandatory reference list suggested in the course. You don't have to reference all them, only the appropriate ones | '''References''' References seem valid, but research how you can appropriately reference the mandatory reference list suggested in the course. You don't have to reference all them, only the appropriate ones | ||
| − | '''General''' Good and clear structure. I would be cautious about including two big topics, risk management and agile project management, in one article. Remember that the article needs to be address a knowledge are in enough depth to be relevant and interesting for a project practitioner. I would clearly then frame it as risk management within the context of agile project management in the abstract and throughout the article | + | '''General''' Good and clear structure. I would be cautious about including two big topics, risk management and agile project management, in one article. Remember that the article needs to be address a knowledge are in enough depth to be relevant and interesting for a project practitioner. I would clearly then frame it as risk management within the context of agile project management in the abstract and throughout the article - I can see you briefly did so, but try to make it crystal clear for the reader |
Revision as of 23:25, 12 February 2018
Text clarity The text sounds coherent
Language Can be improved - e.g. what do you mean by "..ensures that the project continues being rentable?"
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, but consider adding a brief one liner explaining what exactly agile project management is. Also, see my comment about risk management and how it fits in Agile Project Management under "General"
Purpose explanation Well addressed and the article structure is outlined, but who is your reader? Is it the project manager? Does this apply article apply to a specific industry?
Title of the Wiki Good title
References References seem valid, but research how you can appropriately reference the mandatory reference list suggested in the course. You don't have to reference all them, only the appropriate ones
General Good and clear structure. I would be cautious about including two big topics, risk management and agile project management, in one article. Remember that the article needs to be address a knowledge are in enough depth to be relevant and interesting for a project practitioner. I would clearly then frame it as risk management within the context of agile project management in the abstract and throughout the article - I can see you briefly did so, but try to make it crystal clear for the reader
