Talk:Feasibility Analysis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Abstract Feedback= | ==Abstract Feedback== | ||
'''Text clarity''' Text is coherent | '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent | ||
Revision as of 09:19, 14 February 2018
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Text is coherent
Language Minor errors e.g. writing "kids" instead of "kinds"
Description of the tool/theory/concept Okay, but add references to increase credibility. The abstract can be expanded
Purpose explanation Good, but can be improved:
- Consider explaining the structure and content of the article to align reader expectations
References Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references
Relevance of article Good, but consider the following:
- Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?
- Try linking the topic to a project life cycle (check PMBOK)
- Consider linking this to creating a business case?