Talk:Business Case

From DTU ProjectLab
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Abstract Feedback)
(Feedback to first version of Wiki article)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
==Feedback to first version of Wiki article==
 
==Feedback to first version of Wiki article==
*Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
+
*'''Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?'''
*Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
+
**
*Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?
+
*'''Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?'''
 +
**
 +
*'''Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?'''
 +
**

Revision as of 10:43, 17 February 2018

Abstract Feedback

Text clarity Text is coherent

Language Good

Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, consider elaborating the tools for making a business case mentioned in the abstract

Purpose explanation Good, but consider who your reader is - is the project manager? project sponsor?

References Good

Relevance of article Very relevant. Perhaps consider, when writing the article, expanding on what the governance is around who decides/approves a business case in a project management organization?

Feedback to first version of Wiki article

  • Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
  • Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
  • Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
ConceptBox
Toolbox