Talk:Negotiation techniques
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Abstract Feedback) |
(→Abstract Feedback) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well explained | '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well explained | ||
− | '''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of the article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in | + | '''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of the article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in general" for info on article structure |
'''References''' Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards | '''References''' Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards |
Revision as of 10:31, 18 February 2018
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Good
Language Good with minor spelling mistakes: e.g. write "her" instead of "hers" and write "role" instead of "rolle"
Description of the tool/theory/concept Well explained
Purpose explanation Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of the article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in general" for info on article structure
References Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards
Relevance of article Relevant
Article in general Good topic, but consider the structure of your article. The following structure is recommended
- Summary/abstract
- Big idea/theory
- Application
- Limitations
- Annotated bibliography