Prefabricated houses (industrial process)
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Summary) |
(→Summary) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
• Quality of the summary: Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? | • Quality of the summary: Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? | ||
− | The <ref name='' | + | The <ref name=''https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea''> <idea/ref> idea is based on the Lecture which explain the meanings of: Project, program and Portfolio, showing BMW's' models. Starting from this concept, I would like to develop, using the same managing system of BMW models on the market, but applying it, to prefabricated houses and to their entire industry. This is an hard concept, both to understand and to improve, because is not common in the housing industry. There are already numerous prefabricated projects on the market, carried out by important industries in the sector. These companies are responsible for providing the customer with a complete home, built according to needs and requests. Therefore, for each individual project, the company will have to adapt its production each time according to the guidelines received. My idea, on the other hand, is based on allowing companies to mass-produce their own prefabricated houses. Once completed a comprehensive and exhaustive portfolio, customers will have to adapt their requests, depending on the products provided by the company. In this way the company can recover large sums of money by applying a series construction process that remains unchanged. At the same time you can save a lot of time, because you do not have to change the production methods. |
include at least 1 reference: | include at least 1 reference: |
Revision as of 11:42, 12 February 2019
Summary
The quality criteria used to evaluate the articles are: Is your Wiki article relevant? • Does it address a topic that is relevant for project managers? • Is the purpose clearly articulated, i.e. what kind of problem the article addresses (and solves)? Is the Wiki article usable? • Does the article provide hands on guidance? Can the reader (at least prototypically) apply the method after reading the article? • Depth of treatment: Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? • Quality of the summary: Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
The [1]
Cite error:
<ref>
tags exist, but no <references/>
tag was found