Earned Value Management (EVM)
(→Abstract) |
(→cheatsheet) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
re-cite: | re-cite: | ||
<ref name="PMBOK"/> | <ref name="PMBOK"/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wiki Deliverable 1: Abstract | ||
| + | The abstract should not exceed about 250-300 words. It should consist of the summary of your article, as well as a table of contents with bullet points explaining the content of each section. Please already include key references in the abstract. | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
Revision as of 16:35, 10 February 2021
Contents |
cheatsheet
cite first time: [1]
re-cite: [1]
Wiki Deliverable 1: Abstract The abstract should not exceed about 250-300 words. It should consist of the summary of your article, as well as a table of contents with bullet points explaining the content of each section. Please already include key references in the abstract.
Abstract
Earned value management (EVM) is a methodology used in project management to evaluate the performance of a project at any given point. This is done by comparing the expected outcome of the three constraints cost, time and scope, to the actual outcome [2]. In order to properly measure the
Big idea
describe the tool, concept or theory and explain its purpose. The section should reflect the current state of the art on the topic
Application
provide guidance on how to use the tool, concept or theory and when it is applicable
Limitations
Critically reflect on the tool/concept/theory and its application context. What can it do, what can it not do? Under what circumstances should it be used, and when not? How does it compare to the “status quo” of the standards – is it part of it, or does it extent them? Discuss your article in the context of key readings / resources provided in class. Substantiate your claims with literature
Annotated bibliography
Provide key references (3-10), where a reader can find additional information on the subject. The article MUST make appropriate references to the and reference material provided in class – either incorporating it as a source, or critically discussing aspects that are missing from it but covered by this article. Summarize and outline the relevance of each reference to the topic (around 100 words per reference). The bibliography is not counted in the suggested 3000 word target length of the article.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Project Management Institute, Inc.. (2017). Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 6th Edition. Newtown Square: Independent Publishers Group.
- ↑ Project Management Institute (2012) Practice standards for earned value management. 2nd ed. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
