Talk:Critical Path Method in Construction Industry: Difference between revisions

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Anna: I don't have a lot to say about your abstract. It is a very good choice of topic and you have managed to focus on a specific method. The overall structure seems good als..."
 
S150821 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Anna: I don't have a lot to say about your abstract. It is a very good choice of topic and you have managed to focus on a specific method. The overall structure seems good also, so I believe this could be a very interesting and useful article when completed.
Anna: I don't have a lot to say about your abstract. It is a very good choice of topic and you have managed to focus on a specific method. The overall structure seems good also, so I believe this could be a very interesting and useful article when completed.
==Feedback from s150821==
*The article is well written, its reading is fluent and really engaging.  Its structure follows perfectly  what it is requested by the assignment.
*Images are exhaustive , they give the reader a quick understanding of the topic;
*External links to other pages of Wikipedia are a good idea, they make the article understanding  easier;
*References are punctual and from reliable sources;
*The only deficiency of this article is in  “Use Limitations”  section; while  situations in which this method can be applied are well treated along the article , use limitations of CPM are not as comprehensive as it is the whole article.

Revision as of 19:49, 22 September 2015

Anna: I don't have a lot to say about your abstract. It is a very good choice of topic and you have managed to focus on a specific method. The overall structure seems good also, so I believe this could be a very interesting and useful article when completed.

Feedback from s150821

  • The article is well written, its reading is fluent and really engaging. Its structure follows perfectly what it is requested by the assignment.
  • Images are exhaustive , they give the reader a quick understanding of the topic;
  • External links to other pages of Wikipedia are a good idea, they make the article understanding easier;
  • References are punctual and from reliable sources;
  • The only deficiency of this article is in “Use Limitations” section; while situations in which this method can be applied are well treated along the article , use limitations of CPM are not as comprehensive as it is the whole article.