Talk:Project Execution Model (PEM)
(Created page with "Mette: Very nice topic choice that fits the requirements for the type of article. Remember the structure of a "method article". Look forward to reading more about this tool.") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Mette: Very nice topic choice that fits the requirements for the type of article. Remember the structure of a "method article". Look forward to reading more about this tool. | Mette: Very nice topic choice that fits the requirements for the type of article. Remember the structure of a "method article". Look forward to reading more about this tool. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reviewer 1:Andkamp | ||
| + | |||
| + | • Describes an interesting method developed by Novo Nordisk, a nice blend between case study and method description | ||
| + | • Minor English mistakes, that can be corrected through second time reading | ||
| + | • Good presentation of the topics, however some minor grammar mistakes make it a little more difficult to be read | ||
| + | • Nice figures, but missing captions and misplacement could provide a better outlook. | ||
| + | • Main points are clear but not extensively described, in order the reader to get a better understanding of the topic. | ||
| + | • No figure reference | ||
| + | • More effort in inter-wiki links and hyperlinks in the text should be done | ||
| + | • Better matrix of plan communication of stakeholders | ||
| + | • Missing references and bibliography | ||
| + | • Interesting subject with various aspects | ||
| + | • Length of the article is small, as probably it is unfinished, but there is a clear enthusiasm on that subject | ||
| + | • Phases makes a concrete structure of the article but the sections should be better presented in the table of contents. | ||
| + | • It would be nice to see implementations on other business, as well as the pros and cons of this method | ||
| + | • All in all, a nice subject that needs more effort in order to be useful and be connected with subjects such as Project Evaluation and Selection for the Formation of the Optimal Portfolio | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 22 September 2015
Mette: Very nice topic choice that fits the requirements for the type of article. Remember the structure of a "method article". Look forward to reading more about this tool.
Reviewer 1:Andkamp
• Describes an interesting method developed by Novo Nordisk, a nice blend between case study and method description • Minor English mistakes, that can be corrected through second time reading • Good presentation of the topics, however some minor grammar mistakes make it a little more difficult to be read • Nice figures, but missing captions and misplacement could provide a better outlook. • Main points are clear but not extensively described, in order the reader to get a better understanding of the topic. • No figure reference • More effort in inter-wiki links and hyperlinks in the text should be done • Better matrix of plan communication of stakeholders • Missing references and bibliography • Interesting subject with various aspects • Length of the article is small, as probably it is unfinished, but there is a clear enthusiasm on that subject • Phases makes a concrete structure of the article but the sections should be better presented in the table of contents. • It would be nice to see implementations on other business, as well as the pros and cons of this method • All in all, a nice subject that needs more effort in order to be useful and be connected with subjects such as Project Evaluation and Selection for the Formation of the Optimal Portfolio
