Pooled, Sequential & Reciprocal Interdependence

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Abstract==  
 
==Abstract==  
  
Large scale projects encompassing various cross functional business units or teams have been characterized through their structural complexity. These complexities occur due to uncertainties which often is a direct consequence of vacillating resources streaming throughout the project team.<ref name=''A'>"[https://www-webofscience-com.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000466771700002?SID=C6eFZCHmPfpPMCWPFkJ F. Ter Chian Tan, S. L. Pan and M. Zuo, "Realising platform operational agility through information technology–enabled capabilities: A resource‐interdependence perspective," INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 582-608, 2019]</ref> These resources vary from team to team and can be crucial for the success of the overall performance.These interlinkages of workflow between groups were conceptualized by '''Thompson (1967)''' <ref name='B'> "[https://www-jstor-org.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/stable/10.1086/210223?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents B. Victor and R. S. Blackburn, "Interdependence: An Alternative Conceptualization," The Academy of Management Review, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 486-498, 1987]</ref> naming them “''interdependencies''”. Interdependencies were categorized according to the severity of their dependence to one another. The term can be defined as the extent to which groups/business units/teams are interdependent with one another and are essentially dependent upon the action of others for their success. An additional area of interest for scholars has been external interdependencies. (e.g., buyer-supplier relationships) These relationships indicate specific firm level dependencies where being dependent on another is seen as an integral part and “boundary spanners” for successful cooperation between organizations. <ref name=''C'>"[https://www-webofscience-com.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:A1986AYJ8300002?SID=C1aYmQfJvpKHrgrIhOD R. H. Chenhall and D. Morris, "THE IMPACT OF STRUCTURE, ENVIRONMENT, AND INTERDEPENDENCE ON THE PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS," Accounting Review, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 16-135, 1986]</ref>However, this article aims to illustrate dependencies from an inter-organisational point of view, in which contrasting historic concepts of interdependencies will be reviewed. Furthermore, it is aimed to highlight the groundwork of the notion constructed by Thompson (1967) in introducing the following concepts: pooled, sequential, and reciprocal interdependencies.
+
Large scale projects encompassing various cross functional business units or teams have been characterized through their structural complexity. These complexities occur due to uncertainties which often is a direct consequence of vacillating resources streaming throughout the project team.<ref name=''A'>"[https://www-webofscience-com.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000466771700002?SID=C6eFZCHmPfpPMCWPFkJ F. Ter Chian Tan, S. L. Pan and M. Zuo, "Realising platform operational agility through information technology–enabled capabilities: A resource‐interdependence perspective," INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 582-608, 2019]</ref> These resources vary from team to team and can be crucial for the success of the overall performance.These interlinkages of workflow between groups were conceptualized by '''Thompson (1967)''' <ref name='B'> "[https://www-jstor-org.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/stable/10.1086/210223?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents B. Victor and R. S. Blackburn, "Interdependence: An Alternative Conceptualization," The Academy of Management Review, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 486-498, 1987]</ref> naming them “''interdependencies''”.Interdependencies were categorized according to the severity of their dependence to one another. The term can be defined as the extent to which groups/business units/teams are interdependent with one another and are essentially dependent upon the action of others for their success. An additional area of interest for scholars has been external interdependencies. (e.g., buyer-supplier relationships) These relationships indicate specific firm level dependencies where being dependent on another is seen as an integral part and “boundary spanners” for successful cooperation between organizations. <ref name=''C'>"[https://www-webofscience-com.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:A1986AYJ8300002?SID=C1aYmQfJvpKHrgrIhOD R. H. Chenhall and D. Morris, "THE IMPACT OF STRUCTURE, ENVIRONMENT, AND INTERDEPENDENCE ON THE PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS," Accounting Review, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 16-135, 1986]</ref>However, this article aims to illustrate dependencies from an inter-organisational point of view, in which contrasting historic concepts of interdependencies will be reviewed. Furthermore, it is aimed to highlight the groundwork of the notion constructed by Thompson (1967) in introducing the following concepts: pooled, sequential, and reciprocal interdependencies.
  
 
==Interdependency Theory==
 
==Interdependency Theory==

Revision as of 14:29, 10 February 2022

Contents


Abstract

Large scale projects encompassing various cross functional business units or teams have been characterized through their structural complexity. These complexities occur due to uncertainties which often is a direct consequence of vacillating resources streaming throughout the project team.[1] These resources vary from team to team and can be crucial for the success of the overall performance.These interlinkages of workflow between groups were conceptualized by Thompson (1967) [2] naming them “interdependencies”.Interdependencies were categorized according to the severity of their dependence to one another. The term can be defined as the extent to which groups/business units/teams are interdependent with one another and are essentially dependent upon the action of others for their success. An additional area of interest for scholars has been external interdependencies. (e.g., buyer-supplier relationships) These relationships indicate specific firm level dependencies where being dependent on another is seen as an integral part and “boundary spanners” for successful cooperation between organizations. [3]However, this article aims to illustrate dependencies from an inter-organisational point of view, in which contrasting historic concepts of interdependencies will be reviewed. Furthermore, it is aimed to highlight the groundwork of the notion constructed by Thompson (1967) in introducing the following concepts: pooled, sequential, and reciprocal interdependencies.

Interdependency Theory

Various perspectives, constructs, resource/task interdependency

Pooled, Sequential & Reciprocal Interdependecies According to J.D.Thompson

Pooled Interdependence

Sequential Interdependence

Reciprocal Interdependence

Coordinating Interdependence in Cross-Functional Project Teams

Standartization of Work Processes

Planning and Scheduling

Mutual Adjustments

Limitations of the Construct

Annotated Bibliography

References

[4]

Big Idea: describe the tool, concept or theory and explain its purpose. The section should reflect the current state of the art on the topic

Application: provide guidance on how to use the tool, concept or theory and when it is applicable

Limitations: critically reflect on the tool/concept/theory. When possible, substantiate your claims with literature

Annotated bibliography : Provide key references (3 10), where a reader can find additional information on the subject.


  1. "F. Ter Chian Tan, S. L. Pan and M. Zuo, "Realising platform operational agility through information technology–enabled capabilities: A resource‐interdependence perspective," INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 582-608, 2019
  2. "B. Victor and R. S. Blackburn, "Interdependence: An Alternative Conceptualization," The Academy of Management Review, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 486-498, 1987
  3. "R. H. Chenhall and D. Morris, "THE IMPACT OF STRUCTURE, ENVIRONMENT, AND INTERDEPENDENCE ON THE PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS," Accounting Review, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 16-135, 1986
  4. "Détienne, F. (2006). Collaborative design: Managing task interdependencies and multiple perspectives. Interacting with Computers, 18(1 SPEC. ISS.), 1-20. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.05.001
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox