Talk:Risk Profile in General Contracting
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* The structure looks fine both regards to the formatting and the red threat. | * The structure looks fine both regards to the formatting and the red threat. | ||
* Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺ | * Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺ | ||
| + | |||
s150905, Review 2: | s150905, Review 2: | ||
| + | |||
The idea behind this article seem really interesting, but most of the article itself is missing | The idea behind this article seem really interesting, but most of the article itself is missing | ||
* The sketched structure appears to be just a draft of the final one, and if the one I see now is the final one I think is not satisfactory for a good work | * The sketched structure appears to be just a draft of the final one, and if the one I see now is the final one I think is not satisfactory for a good work | ||
* The lack of text and imagines make impossible to me to do some actual consideration about the work | * The lack of text and imagines make impossible to me to do some actual consideration about the work | ||
Revision as of 16:08, 22 September 2015
KB1991, reviewer 2:
- What there is written so far is good.
- Good introduction that describes the topic briefly, but the last part has been written twice.
- The structure looks fine both regards to the formatting and the red threat.
- Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺
s150905, Review 2:
The idea behind this article seem really interesting, but most of the article itself is missing
- The sketched structure appears to be just a draft of the final one, and if the one I see now is the final one I think is not satisfactory for a good work
- The lack of text and imagines make impossible to me to do some actual consideration about the work
