Talk:Managing Uncertainty and Risk on the Project
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Anna: It is an interesting and very relevant topic, however, I would suggest that you try to narrow down the scope and focus your article on one method/tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure :) | Anna: It is an interesting and very relevant topic, however, I would suggest that you try to narrow down the scope and focus your article on one method/tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure :) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reviewer 3:Andkamp | ||
| + | *Great use of English and nice sentences structure | ||
| + | *Great subject but, very broad, needs to be narrowed a little bit | ||
| + | *Nice figures, but the matrix with the papers is something I expected to be illustrated in matrix and not a Figure, in order to maintain the wiki style of the article. | ||
| + | *Nice Referencing of the figures, although it hadn't any inter-wiki links or in text links. | ||
| + | *The interest of a practitioner could be greater if there was more focusing in aspects of this subject. | ||
| + | *Profound relation with project management | ||
| + | *The good structure assures logical flow | ||
| + | *Extremely poor reference material for such extended article, that could lead someone with bad intensions to think that there's some amount of plagiarism | ||
| + | *Expected to see pros/cons | ||
| + | *Implementations would narrow the whole subject and make it more interesting | ||
| + | Generally speaking a more wiki style text, with hyperlinks,more bibliography and see also section would be more appropriate to this great text. | ||
Revision as of 18:12, 22 September 2015
Review1, Buurbuur: - I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course. - Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure. - However I find the scope very broad, maybe choose only to focus on project or portofolio management. - In the definition section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints - Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics - However I find the figures clear and understandable - Good that there are references on every figure
Anna: It is an interesting and very relevant topic, however, I would suggest that you try to narrow down the scope and focus your article on one method/tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure :)
Reviewer 3:Andkamp
- Great use of English and nice sentences structure
- Great subject but, very broad, needs to be narrowed a little bit
- Nice figures, but the matrix with the papers is something I expected to be illustrated in matrix and not a Figure, in order to maintain the wiki style of the article.
- Nice Referencing of the figures, although it hadn't any inter-wiki links or in text links.
- The interest of a practitioner could be greater if there was more focusing in aspects of this subject.
- Profound relation with project management
- The good structure assures logical flow
- Extremely poor reference material for such extended article, that could lead someone with bad intensions to think that there's some amount of plagiarism
- Expected to see pros/cons
- Implementations would narrow the whole subject and make it more interesting
Generally speaking a more wiki style text, with hyperlinks,more bibliography and see also section would be more appropriate to this great text.
