Talk:Stakeholder Analysis and Matrices
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# '''Pros''' | # '''Pros''' | ||
## Very good, clear and engaging agenda/introduction. | ## Very good, clear and engaging agenda/introduction. | ||
| − | ## Good explanation of both Stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix. | + | ## Good explanation of both Stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix. |
| + | ## The figures give a good overview of the theory and methods | ||
# '''Missing formalities''' | # '''Missing formalities''' | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 22 September 2015
Mette: Hello, I like your idea. It seems like you have a clear agenda of what you want to write about. Maybe you could have a discussion between the use of stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix.
Reviewer 3: S102935
- Pros
- Very good, clear and engaging agenda/introduction.
- Good explanation of both Stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix.
- The figures give a good overview of the theory and methods
- Missing formalities
- Remember to add table numberings on your final article
- The annotated bibliography seem like an important part of the article, so remember to do so when finishing the article.
- Suggestions
- Try to link your subject to other relevant articles.
- The discussion between the stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix is well placed, but keep in mind to focus on the red thread between the chapters, when you fill in the missing information.
