Talk:The Critical Path Method (CPM)
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* The discussion part on the limitations is good, it seems like you touch a lot of different aspects. | * The discussion part on the limitations is good, it seems like you touch a lot of different aspects. | ||
* Under ‘Additional reading’ you write something about ''"more information on the Cynefin Framework"'' – I think that must be a mistake? :-) | * Under ‘Additional reading’ you write something about ''"more information on the Cynefin Framework"'' – I think that must be a mistake? :-) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''s103183, Reviewer 1:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | *'''!!!!!I Made this review just before class today, but just noticed that a lot has changed since then!!!!!''' | ||
| + | * I like the overall structure of the article and the introduction and that the introduction to CPM is no to detailed and hard to follow. | ||
| + | * The first thing I notice however is that the article is not yet finished as several parts are missing. | ||
| + | * A good thing is that you seem to have a lot of different references which shows that you have reseached the topic even though the article is far from finished. | ||
| + | * I would recommend to put in an example of how to use it or somehow show how to use the method when you finish the article. | ||
| + | * An idea could be to give a short description of the additional reading, what it contains etc. | ||
| + | * As a last comment I would recommend to change the text in the ”Additional reading part” from ”the Cynefin Framework” to something like ”The Critical Path Method”. | ||
Revision as of 20:15, 22 September 2015
Anna: Very nice topic that focuses on a specific tool. It seems that you have a good grasp on the structure and that you will follow the requirements stated.
Review 2, Nannats
- I think it is nice that you have linked to some of the other wiki articles – you are good at doing that through the entire article :-)
- I think that the language through the article is good, and easy to understand.
- In my opinion, the section ‘Guidance on use’, is long and with a lot of text. You could consider making a subsection with either the ‘challenges’ that you mention or the ‘Fast Tracking or Crashing’ part.
- In my point of view, I miss something (maybe a guidance) on how to find the critical path, maybe with an example. The section with the ‘Tool and Method’ does not quite seem to be finish?
- The discussion part on the limitations is good, it seems like you touch a lot of different aspects.
- Under ‘Additional reading’ you write something about "more information on the Cynefin Framework" – I think that must be a mistake? :-)
s103183, Reviewer 1:
- !!!!!I Made this review just before class today, but just noticed that a lot has changed since then!!!!!
- I like the overall structure of the article and the introduction and that the introduction to CPM is no to detailed and hard to follow.
- The first thing I notice however is that the article is not yet finished as several parts are missing.
- A good thing is that you seem to have a lot of different references which shows that you have reseached the topic even though the article is far from finished.
- I would recommend to put in an example of how to use it or somehow show how to use the method when you finish the article.
- An idea could be to give a short description of the additional reading, what it contains etc.
- As a last comment I would recommend to change the text in the ”Additional reading part” from ”the Cynefin Framework” to something like ”The Critical Path Method”.
