Talk:Critical Path Method in Construction Industry

Anna: I don't have a lot to say about your abstract. It is a very good choice of topic and you have managed to focus on a specific method. The overall structure seems good also, so I believe this could be a very interesting and useful article when completed.

Feedback from s150821

• The article is well written, its reading is fluent and really engaging. Its structure follows perfectly what it is requested by the assignment.
• Images are exhaustive , they give the reader a quick understanding of the topic;
• External links to other pages of Wikipedia are a good idea, they make the article understanding easier;
• References are punctual and from reliable sources;
• The only deficiency of this article is in “Use Limitations” section; while situations in which this method can be applied are well treated along the article , use limitations of CPM are not as comprehensive as it is the whole article.

(Review 2, S145166)

Format

• Very good abstract summarising article. Follows 'methods' article structure well
• Good use of graphics
• some small grammar errors - read through again
• referencing error in method advantages

Content

• Add an annotated bibliography
• Could include further discussion or just suggested reading about CPM computer programs mentioned
• Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods
• I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT
• Good technical description of how the tool works but could have an extra chapter explaining how it links to project/portfolio management