Talk:Critical Path Method in Construction Industry
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Format) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*Good use of graphics | *Good use of graphics | ||
*some small grammar errors - read through again | *some small grammar errors - read through again | ||
| − | *referencing error in method advantages | + | *referencing error in 5. method advantages |
===Content=== | ===Content=== | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 22 September 2015
Anna: I don't have a lot to say about your abstract. It is a very good choice of topic and you have managed to focus on a specific method. The overall structure seems good also, so I believe this could be a very interesting and useful article when completed.
Contents |
Feedback from s150821 (reviewer 3)
- The article is well written, its reading is fluent and really engaging. Its structure follows perfectly what it is requested by the assignment.
- Images are exhaustive , they give the reader a quick understanding of the topic;
- External links to other pages of Wikipedia are a good idea, they make the article understanding easier;
- References are punctual and from reliable sources;
- The only deficiency of this article is in “Use Limitations” section; while situations in which this method can be applied are well treated along the article , use limitations of CPM are not as comprehensive as it is the whole article.
(Review 2, S145166)
Format
- Very good abstract summarising article. Follows 'methods' article structure well
- Good use of graphics
- some small grammar errors - read through again
- referencing error in 5. method advantages
Content
- Add an annotated bibliography
- Could include further discussion or just suggested reading about CPM computer programs mentioned
- Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods
- I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT
