Talk:Risk Profile in General Contracting

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 23: Line 23:
 
* Impatient to read your article (i am civil engineering student ;-)
 
* Impatient to read your article (i am civil engineering student ;-)
 
* Difficult actually to evaluate your article properly.
 
* Difficult actually to evaluate your article properly.
 +
 +
==Reviewer 3 (s141573)==
 +
The topic is really interesting and it also seems very actual in construction projects.
 +
I like the introduction which I find clear and well structured, keep attention a part is repeated twice!
 +
However, it's hard to give a feedback since most part of the article is missing.
 +
Looking forward for the final article!

Revision as of 22:41, 22 September 2015

KB1991, reviewer 2:

  • What there is written so far is good.
  • Good introduction that describes the topic briefly, but the last part has been written twice.
  • The structure looks fine both regards to the formatting and the red threat.
  • Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺


s150905, Review 2:

The idea behind this article seem really interesting, but most of the article itself is missing

  • The sketched structure appears to be just a draft of the final one, and if the one I see now is the final one I think is not satisfactory for a good work
  • The lack of text and imagines make impossible to me to do some actual consideration about the work


Reviewer 3, 150477

The article has been accessed the 22/09/2015 at 21 p.m.

  • The abstract sounds interesting and your parts constructed in a logical way.
  • The last part has been written twice, be careful!
  • Relevant topic with Risks in Construction.
  • Impatient to read your article (i am civil engineering student ;-)
  • Difficult actually to evaluate your article properly.

Reviewer 3 (s141573)

The topic is really interesting and it also seems very actual in construction projects. I like the introduction which I find clear and well structured, keep attention a part is repeated twice! However, it's hard to give a feedback since most part of the article is missing. Looking forward for the final article!

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox