Talk:Managing Uncertainty and Risk on the Project
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Review1, Buurbuur: | + | tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure -) |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Review1, Buurbuur: | |
| − | + | * I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course. | |
| − | + | * Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure. | |
| − | + | * However I find the scope very broad, maybe choose only to focus on project or portofolio management. | |
| − | + | * In the ''definition'' section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints | |
| − | + | * Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics | |
| + | * Write the full wording before abbreviation in this case i refer to the use of FMEA | ||
| + | * However I find the figures clear and understandable | ||
| + | * Good that there are references on every figure | ||
| − | |||
Reviewer 2:Andkamp | Reviewer 2:Andkamp | ||
Revision as of 23:05, 22 September 2015
tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure -)
Review1, Buurbuur:
- I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course.
- Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure.
- However I find the scope very broad, maybe choose only to focus on project or portofolio management.
- In the definition section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints
- Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics
- Write the full wording before abbreviation in this case i refer to the use of FMEA
- However I find the figures clear and understandable
- Good that there are references on every figure
Reviewer 2:Andkamp
- Great use of English and nice sentences structure
- Great subject but, very broad, needs to be narrowed a little bit
- Nice figures, but the matrix with the papers is something I expected to be illustrated in matrix and not a Figure, in order to maintain the wiki style of the article.
- Nice Referencing of the figures, although it hadn't any inter-wiki links or in text links.
- The interest of a practitioner could be greater if there was more focusing in aspects of this subject.
- Profound relation with project management
- The good structure assures logical flow
- Extremely poor reference material for such extended article, that could lead someone with bad intensions to think that there's some amount of plagiarism
- Expected to see pros/cons
- Implementations would narrow the whole subject and make it more interesting
Generally speaking a more wiki style text, with hyperlinks,more bibliography and see also section would be more appropriate to this great text.
Reviewer 3 - s141938
+
- abstract at the beginning
- captions and figure numbering
- gramatically correct. easy and pleasant to read
- nice references to the graphs - everything is explained nicely
-
- separate consequences in the definitions into paragraphs
- "In the beginning of the a project the uncertainty is very high and depending on the size of the project and to decrease the mission uncertainty it can some extend be used” - I think you're missing something at some point
- really broad - maybe give some methods that are used to minimize risk and uncertainty cause this would stick more with the method type of article
- Advantages and limitations ? (required in the method type article)
- Add more references for higher credibility ;)
- maybe restructure the definition section, to make the article easier to scan quickly
Conclusion: Great article and properly written, but needs to be restructured a bit for quicker scanning of the article and to fit the method article type.
