Talk:Critical Path Method in Construction Industry

Revision as of 17:09, 27 September 2015

Anna: I don't have a lot to say about your abstract. It is a very good choice of topic and you have managed to focus on a specific method. The overall structure seems good also, so I believe this could be a very interesting and useful article when completed.

Note from the author - the response will be provided as red text:

This is how sample response will look like

Feedback from s150821 (reviewer 3)

• The article is well written, its reading is fluent and really engaging. Its structure follows perfectly what it is requested by the assignment.
• Images are exhaustive , they give the reader a quick understanding of the topic;
• External links to other pages of Wikipedia are a good idea, they make the article understanding easier;
• References are punctual and from reliable sources;
• The only deficiency of this article is in “Use Limitations” section; while situations in which this method can be applied are well treated along the article , use limitations of CPM are not as comprehensive as it is the whole article.

(Review 2, S145166)

Format

• Very good abstract summarising article. Follows 'methods' article structure well
• Good use of graphics
• some small grammar errors - read through again
• referencing error in 5. method advantages

Content

• Add an annotated bibliography
• Could include further discussion or just suggested reading about CPM computer programs mentioned
• Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods
• I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT

alex161 (reviewer 1)

In general I like the topic and I read it nicely, the structure seems good . Something is missing around the article but I think you are on a good way. Good job! Structure

• Summary is written in a good and understandable way, I like it .
• The figure are appropried with the topics
• Remember to add the sources to the figures .

Contents

• I think that the short history part is a good way to start , it is very concise and understandable
• Try to explain bettter the example of CPM graph creation
• The flow of the article is linear and logical without any problem to understand the topics .
• Remember to add some brief summary to the bibliography
• Maybe you should improve the limitations and method advantagess, with some sentences explaining a bit more than the bullet points .