Logical Framework Approach in Project Planning
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
As it is with all methodologies, the LFA does have downsides. These concerns, as an example, its inability to change with the changing environmental conditions, due to its way of considering projects as having a linear predetermined path with accompanying targets. Naturally this article will in addition to describing the use of an LFA, suggest to various possible improvements to | As it is with all methodologies, the LFA does have downsides. These concerns, as an example, its inability to change with the changing environmental conditions, due to its way of considering projects as having a linear predetermined path with accompanying targets. Naturally this article will in addition to describing the use of an LFA, suggest to various possible improvements to | ||
| + | |||
| + | __TOC__ | ||
== Big Idea == | == Big Idea == | ||
Revision as of 22:00, 11 September 2016
Abstract
The Logical Framework Approach (LFA) is a project planning, design and evaluation methodology, and a product of a U.S. Agency for International Development initiative in 1969, which aimed at analyzing and diagnosing their project evaluation system. The study revealed three underlying problems the planning were too vague, management responsibility were unclear, and that project evaluation were an adversary process. The LFA were thereby became a response to these problems.
In the LFA the project development process viewed a hierarchy of events and assumptions related to those events. The overall goal is reached, if the projects purpose is achieved, which is realized, if the output is produced, which is then again produced, if the activities take place. This goal oriented planning forces the project members to think through the project's logic, and what might influence the performance. It is exactly this structured approach, which is a major strength of the LFA. It makes the project overview is easy to acquire, and performance indicators can be identified for monitoring and evaluation.
As it is with all methodologies, the LFA does have downsides. These concerns, as an example, its inability to change with the changing environmental conditions, due to its way of considering projects as having a linear predetermined path with accompanying targets. Naturally this article will in addition to describing the use of an LFA, suggest to various possible improvements to
Contents |
Big Idea
Here the methodology's origin and purpose is described. This will focus on describing the current practice of using the LFA.
Application
This section provides the reader with knowledge about how to use the LFA in a project. Some of its limitations might already be mentioned here by referring the reader to the Limitations section, as they, along with appropriate counter measures can provide valuable information about the application of the methodology.
Limitation
The limitations referred to in the application section are described here, and although some of them can stand alone without references to literature, the majority will be those mentioned in previous literature.
Annotated bibliography
Each of the 3-10 references and further readings are summarized with 100 words. Citation style will follow the Havard format (see [1]).
