Talk:Implementing KPIs

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Feedback - Char: new section)
 
(Feedback - Char)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*Nice language
 
*Nice language
 
*Good and clear structure
 
*Good and clear structure
* Code the references. <ref>[her you write you reference name etc.]</ref> this should be put in to the text, where you want the reference to be. In the section reference you write <references/> and then all the reference will appear.  
+
* Code the references." <ref>[her you write you reference name etc.]</ref> " this should be put in to the text, where you want the reference to be. In the section reference you write " <references/> "and then all the reference will appear.  
 
* The length is good. You cover the chosen subject.
 
* The length is good. You cover the chosen subject.
  

Revision as of 17:22, 25 November 2014

Feedback - Char

FORMAL ASPECTS

  • Good critical approach
  • Nice language
  • Good and clear structure
  • Code the references." [1] " this should be put in to the text, where you want the reference to be. In the section reference you write "
    1. [her you write you reference name etc.]
"and then all the reference will appear.
  • The length is good. You cover the chosen subject.

CONTENT ASPECTS Introduction

  • The introduction is very catchy

So, what does the literature say Comparable standards

  • You could add a more history view on the KPI in order to create and understanding of he term. When where the term used first, develop etc.
  • You could create a table with the different standards, their description, KIPs and diversity. This will create a overview of the different standards and make it easier for the reader to compare them.

Additional related material

  • Look at CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration). This is a process that determines/viewer (by some kind of measurement) maturity of different processes and thereby show where there need to be improved

The setup How to define KPIs

  • Very good discussion about the number of measurements.

Scorecards and Dashboards

  • Add figure of the Scorecards and Dashboards
  • Explain what parameters the two setups are containing in order to create overview and how they are using the information and data.
  • You could expand your description about the differences between the scorecards and dashboards. The whole section is a bit short.

Discussion Strength and weaknesses

  • Good discussion. You are covering many different perspectives.

Implementation advice

  • The examples create a good overview and understanding.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox