Talk:Requirements engineering
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Review by MrP: new section) |
(→General remarks) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Very relevant topic, thorough and well researched article | *Very relevant topic, thorough and well researched article | ||
*Good sample of references and links to other material | *Good sample of references and links to other material | ||
| − | *Some general advice for improvement of the article: 1) | + | *Some general advice for improvement of the article: 1)Make it clearer for the reader if "requirements engineering" should be understood as a well defined discipline and a coherent standard method of practice resembling e.g. Systems engineering, or is it just a collective term for a set of useful tools ? 2) Consider making your introduction/abstract and discussion/conclusion a bit sharper and mutually coherent |
| + | |||
| + | ==Specific remarks== | ||
| + | Below please find som specific remarks, adressing particular sections in your article | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Introductory paragraph=== | ||
Revision as of 20:32, 25 November 2014
Contents |
Review by MrP
General remarks
- Very relevant topic, thorough and well researched article
- Good sample of references and links to other material
- Some general advice for improvement of the article: 1)Make it clearer for the reader if "requirements engineering" should be understood as a well defined discipline and a coherent standard method of practice resembling e.g. Systems engineering, or is it just a collective term for a set of useful tools ? 2) Consider making your introduction/abstract and discussion/conclusion a bit sharper and mutually coherent
Specific remarks
Below please find som specific remarks, adressing particular sections in your article
