Talk:Requirements engineering: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Review by MrP: new section |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Very relevant topic, thorough and well researched article | *Very relevant topic, thorough and well researched article | ||
*Good sample of references and links to other material | *Good sample of references and links to other material | ||
*Some general advice for improvement of the article: 1) | *Some general advice for improvement of the article: 1)Make it clearer for the reader if "requirements engineering" should be understood as a well defined discipline and a coherent standard method of practice resembling e.g. Systems engineering, or is it just a collective term for a set of useful tools ? 2) Consider making your introduction/abstract and discussion/conclusion a bit sharper and mutually coherent | ||
==Specific remarks== | |||
Below please find som specific remarks, adressing particular sections in your article | |||
===Introductory paragraph=== | |||
Revision as of 18:32, 25 November 2014
Review by MrP
General remarks
- Very relevant topic, thorough and well researched article
- Good sample of references and links to other material
- Some general advice for improvement of the article: 1)Make it clearer for the reader if "requirements engineering" should be understood as a well defined discipline and a coherent standard method of practice resembling e.g. Systems engineering, or is it just a collective term for a set of useful tools ? 2) Consider making your introduction/abstract and discussion/conclusion a bit sharper and mutually coherent
Specific remarks
Below please find som specific remarks, adressing particular sections in your article