Talk:Scheduling: Critical path, PERT, Gantt
(Created page with "'''Text clarity''' Clear '''Language''' Good '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good - consider spelling out PERT and briefly introduce a one liner on what...") |
Revision as of 15:52, 13 February 2018
Text clarity Clear
Language Good
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good - consider spelling out PERT and briefly introduce a one liner on what PERT is
Purpose explanation Well addressed (e.g. clear that the Project Manager is the reader), but can be improved by clearly describing the article purpose e.g. "the purpose of this article is to address issues around... by combining PERT and Gantt..." (this is an example on how it could be incorporated in the abstract already written)
Title of the Wiki Title indicates that this article will be large (see "relevance of article")
References Good reference to PMBOK, but try to incorporate more relevant references from the mandatory list of references
Relevance of article Definitely relevant, but I would be cautious with writing about two relatively large topics PERT and Gantt. This could work as long as the article addresses the necessary depth beyond a normal web search.
