Talk:Brainstorming technique
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent '''Language''' Good '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' easy to follow, but see "relevance of art...") |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Language''' Good | '''Language''' Good | ||
| − | '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' | + | '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Easy to follow, but see "relevance of article" |
'''Purpose explanation''' Good structure, but who is your reader? Is it a project/program/portfolio manager or is the team? Are you focusing on project/program/portfolio management? | '''Purpose explanation''' Good structure, but who is your reader? Is it a project/program/portfolio manager or is the team? Are you focusing on project/program/portfolio management? | ||
Revision as of 17:02, 13 February 2018
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Text is coherent
Language Good
Description of the tool/theory/concept Easy to follow, but see "relevance of article"
Purpose explanation Good structure, but who is your reader? Is it a project/program/portfolio manager or is the team? Are you focusing on project/program/portfolio management?
References Good. Try adding appropriate references from mandatory list of references, if it makes sense
Relevance of article Needs work. Consider to:
- Make sure to elaborate how brainstorming is relevant to project/program/portfolio management and not brainstorming in organizational management
- Focus on a particular aspect of project/program/portfolio management e.g. when making a business case
- Get a clear understanding of who your reader is
- Consider alternatives of brainstorming - e.g. "silent brainstorming"
