Revision as of 10:19, 14 February 2018

Abstract Feedback

Text clarity Text is coherent

Language Minor errors e.g. writing "kids" instead of "kinds"

Description of the tool/theory/concept Okay, but add references to increase credibility. The abstract can be expanded

Purpose explanation Good, but can be improved:

1. Consider explaining the structure and content of the article to align reader expectations

References Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references

Relevance of article Good, but consider the following:

1. Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?
2. Try linking the topic to a project life cycle (check PMBOK)
3. Consider linking this to creating a business case?