Talk:Managing Successful Programmes (MSP)
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Abstract Feedback) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Abstract Feedback== | ==Abstract Feedback== | ||
| − | '''Text clarity''' | + | '''Text clarity''' Good |
'''Language''' Minor errors e.g. " To achieve this, the '''''he''''' main idea is to sub-divide..." - remove "he"? | '''Language''' Minor errors e.g. " To achieve this, the '''''he''''' main idea is to sub-divide..." - remove "he"? | ||
| − | '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good | + | '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good, but consider going back to basics. Define what program management is and reference standards/material. Also, is it true that ''all'' organizations need good program management? Also, what defines a successful program? |
| − | '''Purpose explanation''' Good | + | '''Purpose explanation''' Good and sets up the reader's expectations well |
'''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references | '''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
| − | <li> Who is the reader? | + | <li> Who is the reader? Program Manager etc? |
| − | <li> What | + | <li> What will the reader get out of this? |
| − | <li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the | + | <li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the program management community more than a normal web search |
</ol> | </ol> | ||
Revision as of 18:45, 14 February 2018
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Good
Language Minor errors e.g. " To achieve this, the he main idea is to sub-divide..." - remove "he"?
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, but consider going back to basics. Define what program management is and reference standards/material. Also, is it true that all organizations need good program management? Also, what defines a successful program?
Purpose explanation Good and sets up the reader's expectations well
References Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references
Relevance of article Consider the following:
- Who is the reader? Program Manager etc?
- What will the reader get out of this?
- Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the program management community more than a normal web search
