Talk:Managing Successful Programmes (MSP)
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Abstract Feedback) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Language''' Minor errors e.g. " To achieve this, the '''''he''''' main idea is to sub-divide..." - remove "he"? | '''Language''' Minor errors e.g. " To achieve this, the '''''he''''' main idea is to sub-divide..." - remove "he"? | ||
| − | '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good, but consider going back to basics. Define what program management is and reference standards/ | + | '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good, but consider going back to basics. Define what program management is and reference standards/mandatory list of references to add credibility. Also, is it true that ''all'' organizations need good program management? Also, what defines a successful program? |
'''Purpose explanation''' Good and sets up the reader's expectations well | '''Purpose explanation''' Good and sets up the reader's expectations well | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 14 February 2018
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Good
Language Minor errors e.g. " To achieve this, the he main idea is to sub-divide..." - remove "he"?
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, but consider going back to basics. Define what program management is and reference standards/mandatory list of references to add credibility. Also, is it true that all organizations need good program management? Also, what defines a successful program?
Purpose explanation Good and sets up the reader's expectations well
References Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references
Relevance of article Consider the following:
- Who is the reader? Program Manager etc?
- What will the reader get out of this?
- Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the program management community more than a normal web search
