Talk:Business Case: Difference between revisions

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent '''Language''' Good '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good, consider elaborating the tools for ..."
 
JonasHL (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:


'''Relevance of article'''      Very relevant. Perhaps consider, when writing the article, expanding on what the governance is around who decides/approves a business case in a project management organization?
'''Relevance of article'''      Very relevant. Perhaps consider, when writing the article, expanding on what the governance is around who decides/approves a business case in a project management organization?
==Feedback to first version of Wiki article==
*Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
*Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
*Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?

Revision as of 10:38, 17 February 2018

Abstract Feedback

Text clarity Text is coherent

Language Good

Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, consider elaborating the tools for making a business case mentioned in the abstract

Purpose explanation Good, but consider who your reader is - is the project manager? project sponsor?

References Good

Relevance of article Very relevant. Perhaps consider, when writing the article, expanding on what the governance is around who decides/approves a business case in a project management organization?

Feedback to first version of Wiki article

  • Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
  • Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
  • Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?