Talk:Business Case

Revision as of 11:54, 17 February 2018

Abstract Feedback

Text clarity Text is coherent

Language Good

Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, consider elaborating the tools for making a business case mentioned in the abstract

Purpose explanation Good, but consider who your reader is - is the project manager? project sponsor?

References Good

Relevance of article Very relevant. Perhaps consider, when writing the article, expanding on what the governance is around who decides/approves a business case in a project management organization?

Feedback to first version of Wiki article

Note: since the article only contains abstract and headings, I will focus on what is there and recommendations for reading material. :)

• Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
  • The grammar and spelling are overall good and very readable, however, I found the following minor mistakes in the following sentences:
    • The definitions of Business Case are discussed with its limitiations. -> The definitions of Business Case are discussed with its limitations.
    • The Business Case is evaluated through a cost benefit -> The Business Case is evaluated through a cost-benefit
    • justification for undertaking a project, in terms of -> the justification for undertaking a project, in terms of
    • the benefits, cost and risk of alternative options and rationale for -> the benefits, cost, and risk of alternative options and rationale f
• Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
• Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?