Talk:Managing groups for high performance
Malthemuff (Talk | contribs) (→Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Place your name here) |
|||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
''Answer here'' | ''Answer here'' | ||
| − | ==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: '' | + | ==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: ''Malthe Muff''== |
===Question 1 · TEXT=== | ===Question 1 · TEXT=== | ||
| − | '''Quality of the summary:''' | + | '''Quality of the summary:''' |
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? | Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? | ||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
===Answer 1=== | ===Answer 1=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''The objective of the article is clear from the summary and so is the scope. |
| + | |||
| + | The section "Structure of the article" could be a bit more clear. | ||
| + | '' | ||
===Question 2 · TEXT=== | ===Question 2 · TEXT=== | ||
| Line 113: | Line 116: | ||
===Answer 2=== | ===Answer 2=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''The structure of the article is good. It makes sense to start by defining a group and then go deeper in to the subject as the article proceeds. There is also a nice logic to it, so I think you should stick with this structure when finishing your article. Especially, because you introduce all the factors that are important for a team, before suggesting how a PM should form a team. '' |
===Question 3 · TEXT=== | ===Question 3 · TEXT=== | ||
| − | '''Grammar and style:''' | + | '''Grammar and style:''' |
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? | Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? | ||
| Line 125: | Line 128: | ||
===Answer 3=== | ===Answer 3=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''As it is a draft, I will skip this :) '' |
===Question 4 · TEXT=== | ===Question 4 · TEXT=== | ||
| Line 137: | Line 140: | ||
===Answer 4=== | ===Answer 4=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''I am sure you will put some nice figures eventually. I think it would be nice in the group dynamics part or at least use bullets or levels on this part '' |
===Question 5 · TEXT=== | ===Question 5 · TEXT=== | ||
| Line 149: | Line 152: | ||
===Answer 5=== | ===Answer 5=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''Currently none, so will not comment.'' |
===Question 6 · TEXT=== | ===Question 6 · TEXT=== | ||
| Line 161: | Line 164: | ||
===Answer 6=== | ===Answer 6=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''The article makes it possible for the reader to an understanding of what a team/ group is and then covers the whole journey into making a successful team. In addition to the limitations in the end I suggest you also talk about some the challenges there can be in putting a team together e.g. personal dispute, small organisation with limited diversity etc'' |
===Question 7 · TEXT=== | ===Question 7 · TEXT=== | ||
| Line 175: | Line 178: | ||
===Answer 7=== | ===Answer 7=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''I am sure it will eventully :)'' |
| − | + | ||
==Abstract Feedback== | ==Abstract Feedback== | ||
Revision as of 14:12, 19 February 2018
Contents |
Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Rikke - giver feedback i eftermiddag mellem 16:00-17:45 eller 22:30-23:59
Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 1
Answer here
Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 2
Answer here
Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 3
Answer here
Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 4
Answer here
Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 5
Answer here
Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 6
Answer here
Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 7
Answer here
Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Malthe Muff
Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 1
The objective of the article is clear from the summary and so is the scope.
The section "Structure of the article" could be a bit more clear.
Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 2
The structure of the article is good. It makes sense to start by defining a group and then go deeper in to the subject as the article proceeds. There is also a nice logic to it, so I think you should stick with this structure when finishing your article. Especially, because you introduce all the factors that are important for a team, before suggesting how a PM should form a team.
Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 3
As it is a draft, I will skip this :)
Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 4
I am sure you will put some nice figures eventually. I think it would be nice in the group dynamics part or at least use bullets or levels on this part
Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 5
Currently none, so will not comment.
Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 6
The article makes it possible for the reader to an understanding of what a team/ group is and then covers the whole journey into making a successful team. In addition to the limitations in the end I suggest you also talk about some the challenges there can be in putting a team together e.g. personal dispute, small organisation with limited diversity etc
Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 7
I am sure it will eventully :)
Abstract Feedback
Text Clarity; Ok.
Language; Ok.
References; Ok.
Since you reference PMI, look if this standard has any definition of group or/and team, if not find these definitions and compare them group vs. team, investigate if projects are developed by groups or teams and based in this research change or not the title of your article. You still missing more specific references regarding your topic.
In general the abstract is ok, nice that you already established the structure of the article, how ever you still missing the annotated bibliography and reference sections, what you have under your note section are references.
Just a reminder, Annotated bibliography is a list of articles, books or documents followed by a briefly descriptive and evaluative paragraph.
When developing the article don't forget to elaborate and describe the relevance for a Project Manager.
