Resource allocation and crashing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
= Introduction = | = Introduction = | ||
= Resource allocation = | = Resource allocation = | ||
= | == Resource loading == | ||
= Crashing = | == Resource leveling using ALAP heuristics== | ||
= | == Resource scheduling == | ||
= Crashing a project = | |||
== Cost-time trade off == | |||
= Conclusion = | = Conclusion = | ||
= Annotated bibliography = | = Annotated bibliography = | ||
= Introduction References = | = Introduction References = | ||
Common to all projects is the need to allocate available resources in the best possible manner. | Common to all projects is the need to allocate available resources in the best possible manner. | ||
If done correctly by the project manager, she can avoid delays, penalty fees and using unnecessarily many resources on wrong events. | If done correctly by the project manager, she can avoid delays, penalty fees and using unnecessarily many resources on wrong events. | ||
In addition, by analyzing the possibility of crashing the project, the project manager might be able to find a more optimal solution than would be possible by the simple PERT/CPM analysis. Thus this analysis is building upon a PERT/CPM analysis. | In addition, by analyzing the possibility of crashing the project, the project manager might be able to find a more optimal solution than would be possible by the simple PERT/CPM analysis. Thus this analysis is building upon a PERT/CPM analysis. | ||
Revision as of 11:54, 17 February 2019
Contents
Introduction
Resource allocation
Resource loading
Resource leveling using ALAP heuristics
Resource scheduling
Crashing a project
Cost-time trade off
Conclusion
Annotated bibliography
Introduction References
Common to all projects is the need to allocate available resources in the best possible manner. If done correctly by the project manager, she can avoid delays, penalty fees and using unnecessarily many resources on wrong events. In addition, by analyzing the possibility of crashing the project, the project manager might be able to find a more optimal solution than would be possible by the simple PERT/CPM analysis. Thus this analysis is building upon a PERT/CPM analysis.