Talk:The Periodic Table of Project Management
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is coherent, however there's a few grammatical errors. |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''...") |
(→Feedback on Abstract:) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is coherent, however there's a few grammatical errors. | |'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is coherent, however there's a few grammatical errors. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good. There's a large emphasis on the periodic table used in chemistry. I understand this is used in combination with the periodic table of project management, however keep it to a minimum as possible. It's also difficult to understand what "field" is menat in "...three different ways that are used to divide the '''field''' up..." | + | |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good. There's a large emphasis on the periodic table used in chemistry. I understand this is used in combination with the periodic table of project management, however keep it to a minimum as possible. It's also difficult to understand what "field" is menat in "...three different ways that are used to divide the '''field''' up..." - this could be better explained. |
|- | |- | ||
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Well elaborated. | |'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Well elaborated. | ||
Revision as of 11:28, 19 February 2019
Feedback on Abstract:
| Text clarity & language | The text is coherent, however there's a few grammatical errors. |
| Description of the tool/theory/concept | Good. There's a large emphasis on the periodic table used in chemistry. I understand this is used in combination with the periodic table of project management, however keep it to a minimum as possible. It's also difficult to understand what "field" is menat in "...three different ways that are used to divide the field up..." - this could be better explained. |
| Article purpose explanation | Well elaborated. |
| Relevance to curriculum | Relevant |
| References | Good references. Reach out if you have any technical issues with the referencing. |
