Stakeholder analysis
Mariapanousi (Talk | contribs) |
Mariapanousi (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=Stakeholders and stakeholder analysis= | =Stakeholders and stakeholder analysis= | ||
− | According to the classic definition of stakeholders from Project Management Institute that is relevant for any project case “Stakeholders of a project are individuals, groups, or | + | According to the classic definition of stakeholders from Project Management Institute that is relevant for any project case “Stakeholders of a project are individuals, groups, or organisations that are affected or recognised to be affected either in a positive or negative way by a decision, action, or output of a project” <ref name="PMI"/>. |
Stakeholder analysis is referred as the systematic gathering and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data to decide whose interests should be taken into consideration throughout the project. The objective of performing a stakeholder analysis is to provide the project manager and project team an overview of the people who have interest in the project. It should be one of the first steps of each project. It aims to identify everyone with a concern who needs to be involved. | Stakeholder analysis is referred as the systematic gathering and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data to decide whose interests should be taken into consideration throughout the project. The objective of performing a stakeholder analysis is to provide the project manager and project team an overview of the people who have interest in the project. It should be one of the first steps of each project. It aims to identify everyone with a concern who needs to be involved. | ||
=History= | =History= | ||
− | The term stakeholder in terms of definition, use and purpose constitutes a quite unclear concept in the literature and it tend to vary over the years. The first time the term ‘stakeholder’ appeared in the bibliography was in 1963 at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and originally included owners, employees, customers, supplier, lenders and society. However, it is truth that the business world was thinking and | + | The term stakeholder in terms of definition, use and purpose constitutes a quite unclear concept in the literature and it tend to vary over the years. The first time the term ‘stakeholder’ appeared in the bibliography was in 1963 at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and originally included owners, employees, customers, supplier, lenders and society. However, it is truth that the business world was thinking and utilising the stakeholder idea many years before 1960s. According to Dodd (1932), GEC was identifying shareholders, employees, customers, and the general public as the main groups that they had to handle. Sapieca (1990) stated that Johnson & Johnson determined customers, employees, managers, and the general public in 1947. Igor Ansoff and Robert Steward developed further the term based on the SRI’s approach <ref name="Theory"/>. |
− | Freeman (1984) present the definition of stakeholders as “any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the | + | Freeman (1984) present the definition of stakeholders as “any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organisation objectives” in his book “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach <ref name="Freeman"/> .This is one of the most popular definitions as 20 out of 75 in total share this approach. In the figure below, the original stakeholder model developed from Freeman is presented. |
[[File:Freemanmodel.png|1300px|thumb|center|Figure 1: The original stakeholder model Freeman(1984).<ref name="Freeman"/>]] | [[File:Freemanmodel.png|1300px|thumb|center|Figure 1: The original stakeholder model Freeman(1984).<ref name="Freeman"/>]] | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Stakeholder analysis process= | =Stakeholder analysis process= | ||
− | There are several approaches regarding the stakeholder analysis process in the bibliography, but most of them have a common philosophy and can be summarised in four principal steps: Identifying, Prioritising, Profiling and Managing Stakeholders. In the initial stage, there is a need of recognising all the people who are affected or influenced by the project and have an interest in a successful or unsuccessful result. Stakeholders can be internal such as managers and employees or external like customers or suppliers. Stakeholders can also be | + | There are several approaches regarding the stakeholder analysis process in the bibliography, but most of them have a common philosophy and can be summarised in four principal steps: Identifying, Prioritising, Profiling and Managing Stakeholders. In the initial stage, there is a need of recognising all the people who are affected or influenced by the project and have an interest in a successful or unsuccessful result. Stakeholders can be internal such as managers and employees or external like customers or suppliers. Stakeholders can also be characterised primary with a direct interest and stake to the project (employees, customer, suppliers) or secondary who do not engage in direct exchange but are affected by or can affect the project (business partners, competitors, regulatory authority). The next step is to asses and prioritise stakeholders according to their importance related to the project. Subsequently, stakeholder engagement follows, and the stakeholder analysis process finishes with stakeholder management process. |
===Identify stakeholders=== | ===Identify stakeholders=== | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
[[File:ISO.png|1300px|thumb|center|Figure 2: Project Stakeholders (ISO 21500:2012).<ref name="ISO"/>]] | [[File:ISO.png|1300px|thumb|center|Figure 2: Project Stakeholders (ISO 21500:2012).<ref name="ISO"/>]] | ||
− | It | + | It categorises the stakeholders in three main groups: |
− | #Project | + | #Project organisation that includes the project team, the project management team and the project manager. |
#Project Governance that may include the Project Steering Committee or Board and the Project Sponsor. | #Project Governance that may include the Project Steering Committee or Board and the Project Sponsor. | ||
#Additional stakeholders like Employees, Customers, Suppliers, Shareholders, Business Partners, Finance providers, Regulatory Authorities, Project Management Office and stakeholders with special interest. | #Additional stakeholders like Employees, Customers, Suppliers, Shareholders, Business Partners, Finance providers, Regulatory Authorities, Project Management Office and stakeholders with special interest. | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
===Prioritise stakeholders=== | ===Prioritise stakeholders=== | ||
− | Once the stakeholders are identified, they are listed in a stakeholder table or represented in a diagram. The next step in the stakeholder analysis process is to prioritise the stakeholders and is commonly performed with the use of mapping techniques <ref name="Stakeholders"/>. | + | Once the stakeholders are identified, they are listed in a stakeholder table or represented in a diagram. The next step in the stakeholder analysis process is to prioritise the stakeholders and is commonly performed with the use of mapping techniques<ref name="Stakeholders"/>. |
Some of the most commonly used mapping techniques constitute the power-interest grid, the power-influence grid, the influence-impact grid and the stakeholder tube and are further analysed below<ref name="Management"/>: | Some of the most commonly used mapping techniques constitute the power-interest grid, the power-influence grid, the influence-impact grid and the stakeholder tube and are further analysed below<ref name="Management"/>: | ||
[[File:Interest_Infulence.png|thumb|1300px|Figure 3: Power/Interest Grid]] | [[File:Interest_Infulence.png|thumb|1300px|Figure 3: Power/Interest Grid]] | ||
− | '''Power/Interest Grid''': In the power-interest grid, also known as Power/Interest matrix, the stakeholders are placed on a two-dimensional graph. The horizontal axis represents the interest level whereas the vertical axis | + | '''Power/Interest Grid''': In the power-interest grid, also known as Power/Interest matrix, the stakeholders are placed on a two-dimensional graph. The horizontal axis represents the interest level whereas the vertical axis symbolises the power and the authority related to the project. For example, on the one hand, in the case that a stakeholder has both a high influence and interest in the project, it is considered as key stakeholder with a high importance in the project. On the other hand, if a stakeholder lacks influence in the project, then he is not likely to affect the project in a high level, even in the case that he has high interest. A typical Power/ Interest grid is presented below. The Power/Interest Grid is the one of the most commonly methods for mapping and prioritising stakeholders. |
+ | Power/Influence Grid: The Power/Interest grid model presents similar structure with the aforementioned model and plots the stakeholders in a two-dimensional graph. The axis Y represents the influence level whereas the axis X the capability to influence the decisions and the output of the project. | ||
+ | |||
+ | "'Influence/Impact Grid''': The Influence/Impact Grid plots the stakeholders in a two-dimensional graph, representing their capability to affect the project compared with their ability to cause changes in the project management and execution, and cons in the final outcome. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Stakeholder Cube''': The Stakeholder Cube model maps out the stakeholders in a three-dimensional graphical representation of their interest (active or passive), power (influential or unsubstantial), and power (backer or blocker). A stakeholder cube is represented in the figure below to provide a clear overview and better understanding of the model<ref name="Bourne"/>. | ||
===Profile stakeholders=== | ===Profile stakeholders=== | ||
Line 68: | Line 73: | ||
<ref name="Management">Sanguera P. (2018), Managing the Stakeholders. </ref> | <ref name="Management">Sanguera P. (2018), Managing the Stakeholders. </ref> | ||
<ref name="Stakeholders">Polonsky M. (1996), Stakeholder management and the stakeholder matrix: Potential strategic marketing tools. </ref> | <ref name="Stakeholders">Polonsky M. (1996), Stakeholder management and the stakeholder matrix: Potential strategic marketing tools. </ref> | ||
+ | <ref name="Communication">Hayes, J. (2018), “The Theory and Practice of Change Management </ref> | ||
+ | <ref name="Bourne">Bourne L. (2005), Stakeholder Relationship Management </ref> |
Revision as of 18:00, 17 May 2019
Contents |
Abstract
A stakeholder can be shortly described either as an individual, group or organisation who is affected by the output of a project. Stakeholders have an engagement in the achievement of the project and can be inside or outside the organisation that is supporting the project.
Key words: Stakeholders, Stakeholders analysis, Project Management, Portfolio Management, Program Management
Stakeholders and stakeholder analysis
According to the classic definition of stakeholders from Project Management Institute that is relevant for any project case “Stakeholders of a project are individuals, groups, or organisations that are affected or recognised to be affected either in a positive or negative way by a decision, action, or output of a project” [1]. Stakeholder analysis is referred as the systematic gathering and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data to decide whose interests should be taken into consideration throughout the project. The objective of performing a stakeholder analysis is to provide the project manager and project team an overview of the people who have interest in the project. It should be one of the first steps of each project. It aims to identify everyone with a concern who needs to be involved.
History
The term stakeholder in terms of definition, use and purpose constitutes a quite unclear concept in the literature and it tend to vary over the years. The first time the term ‘stakeholder’ appeared in the bibliography was in 1963 at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and originally included owners, employees, customers, supplier, lenders and society. However, it is truth that the business world was thinking and utilising the stakeholder idea many years before 1960s. According to Dodd (1932), GEC was identifying shareholders, employees, customers, and the general public as the main groups that they had to handle. Sapieca (1990) stated that Johnson & Johnson determined customers, employees, managers, and the general public in 1947. Igor Ansoff and Robert Steward developed further the term based on the SRI’s approach [2]. Freeman (1984) present the definition of stakeholders as “any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organisation objectives” in his book “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach [3] .This is one of the most popular definitions as 20 out of 75 in total share this approach. In the figure below, the original stakeholder model developed from Freeman is presented.
Stakeholder analysis process
There are several approaches regarding the stakeholder analysis process in the bibliography, but most of them have a common philosophy and can be summarised in four principal steps: Identifying, Prioritising, Profiling and Managing Stakeholders. In the initial stage, there is a need of recognising all the people who are affected or influenced by the project and have an interest in a successful or unsuccessful result. Stakeholders can be internal such as managers and employees or external like customers or suppliers. Stakeholders can also be characterised primary with a direct interest and stake to the project (employees, customer, suppliers) or secondary who do not engage in direct exchange but are affected by or can affect the project (business partners, competitors, regulatory authority). The next step is to asses and prioritise stakeholders according to their importance related to the project. Subsequently, stakeholder engagement follows, and the stakeholder analysis process finishes with stakeholder management process.
Identify stakeholders
The first key step in stakeholder analysis process is to identify all the people (individuals or groups) and organisations that are impacted by the project, and report all relevant information concerning their interests, engagement, influence and effect on project success. Possible project stakeholders may be people who are [1]:
- employed on the project
- sponsoring it or supporting it
- competitors
- contributing to the requirements or are determined to use the final product, process, service, or outcome of the project like regulatory agencies and potential customers; *involved in the marketing and advertising of the product or the service;
- responsible for the financial sustainability of the project;
- offering goods and services that are consumed by the project (suppliers)
- using the result of the project (customers)
There might be also other stakeholders indirectly involved like those contributing in recruitment activities, suppliers who contribute to the project by offering resources to the project, shareholders, those performing administrative and logistic tasks, the project management office that might perform various activities like governance, standardisation, project management trainings and so on. It is of crucial importance that the project team starts with identification of right (and legal) stakeholders, identifying their needs, demands, wishes, preferences dreams and priorities. It is important to take into consideration that stakeholder identification is not a stable activity that is done only in the initial days of the project, but it is a dynamic process that needs to be continuously updated as the project is in progress. Once the stakeholders are identified, they are listed in a stakeholder table or represented in a diagram. In order to better understand the different categories of stakeholders, a diagram from ISO 21500:2012, Guidance on Project Management, an international standard developed by the International Organisation for Standardisation, is used. It includes any person inside and outside the project as is represented in the figure below.
It categorises the stakeholders in three main groups:
- Project organisation that includes the project team, the project management team and the project manager.
- Project Governance that may include the Project Steering Committee or Board and the Project Sponsor.
- Additional stakeholders like Employees, Customers, Suppliers, Shareholders, Business Partners, Finance providers, Regulatory Authorities, Project Management Office and stakeholders with special interest.
Prioritise stakeholders
Once the stakeholders are identified, they are listed in a stakeholder table or represented in a diagram. The next step in the stakeholder analysis process is to prioritise the stakeholders and is commonly performed with the use of mapping techniques[5]. Some of the most commonly used mapping techniques constitute the power-interest grid, the power-influence grid, the influence-impact grid and the stakeholder tube and are further analysed below[6]:
Power/Interest Grid: In the power-interest grid, also known as Power/Interest matrix, the stakeholders are placed on a two-dimensional graph. The horizontal axis represents the interest level whereas the vertical axis symbolises the power and the authority related to the project. For example, on the one hand, in the case that a stakeholder has both a high influence and interest in the project, it is considered as key stakeholder with a high importance in the project. On the other hand, if a stakeholder lacks influence in the project, then he is not likely to affect the project in a high level, even in the case that he has high interest. A typical Power/ Interest grid is presented below. The Power/Interest Grid is the one of the most commonly methods for mapping and prioritising stakeholders. Power/Influence Grid: The Power/Interest grid model presents similar structure with the aforementioned model and plots the stakeholders in a two-dimensional graph. The axis Y represents the influence level whereas the axis X the capability to influence the decisions and the output of the project.
"'Influence/Impact Grid: The Influence/Impact Grid plots the stakeholders in a two-dimensional graph, representing their capability to affect the project compared with their ability to cause changes in the project management and execution, and cons in the final outcome.
Stakeholder Cube: The Stakeholder Cube model maps out the stakeholders in a three-dimensional graphical representation of their interest (active or passive), power (influential or unsubstantial), and power (backer or blocker). A stakeholder cube is represented in the figure below to provide a clear overview and better understanding of the model[7].
Profile stakeholders
Stakeholder Management Processes
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Project Management Institute. (2010) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Project Management Institute. ISBN: 9781930699458, 193069945X
- ↑ Fontaine C, Haarman A., Schmid S. (2006), The Stakeholder Theory.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.
- ↑ Guidance on Project Management, ISO 21500:2012.
- ↑ Polonsky M. (1996), Stakeholder management and the stakeholder matrix: Potential strategic marketing tools.
- ↑ Sanguera P. (2018), Managing the Stakeholders.
- ↑ Bourne L. (2005), Stakeholder Relationship Management
Cite error: <ref>
tag with name "Communication" defined in <references>
is not used in prior text.