Revision as of 14:37, 18 November 2014

Constructive controversy is an uncommon method of discussing or learning about a certain topic. It is commonly used in order to reach a consensus about a controversial topic, without having any preconceptions about it, and leading the subjects to a judiciously consensus about the controversy. Constructive controversy is an interesting working method because it can often lead to the students, or subjects, learning much more than just about the topic, because it can make one defend a viewpoint which they might not share from the beginning. Constructive controversy can be seen as an application of the philosophical concept of Methodic Doubt, by René Descartes, which is described as “a way of searching for certainty by systematically though tentatively doubting everything” ^[1]

Through studying the concept it has been found that when faced with the intellectual challenge it will often result in higher-level reasoning strategies, the development, of more complex and coherent conceptual structures, and more critical thinking. (CITE: D.W. Johnson et al., 2000). In these studies the concept was held up against concurrence seeking, debate and individualistic efforts, and the results showed that if constructive controversy frequently was used the subjects would be “imprinted with a pattern of intellectual inquiry that includes building coherent intellectual arguments, giving persuasive presentations, critically analysing and challenging others’ positions, rebutting others’ challenges, seeing issues from a variety of perspectives, and seeking reasoned judgements.” (CITE: D.W. Johnson et al., 2000).

This article will be written as an in-depth description of a particular method. it will include:

• Explanation of the concept

The concept will be explained in this section along with the background and origin of it.

• Step by Step guide on how to apply it

Here the general five steps of how to apply the concept will be accounted for. This section will also contain an example of the application of the concept.

• Discussion

In this section it will be discussed when it is appropriate to use the concept and what the positive and negative aspects of it can be, as well as the role of Constructive controversy in project management.

History and a brief explanation of the Concept

History and Origin

The concept was first talked about by Aristoteles who was of the opinion that constructing a deliberate debate of advantages and disadvantages of a specific topic would end up with a constructive solution.^[2] Earlier in society it was commonly believed that controversy was inherently destructive, and could not be used positively. Thomas Jefferson, however, believed that free and open-minded discussion should be the foundation of society, and that eventually this would lead to truth, especially if opposing points of view are advocated.^[3] Sigmund Freud also indicated that intellectual conflict was a needed factor for psychological development. ^[4] The actual expression 'Constructive Controversy' comes from David W. Johnson's research. David W. Johnson is a social psychologist, currently working at the University of Minnesota. He began his research in the 1960's where he started documenting the role of intellectual conflict in instruction and decision making. He created the theory behind Constructive Controversy and on the basis of his research it is now a more much widespread method of learning than it used to be. ^[5] However it is still not a common method as it requires more of its participants than other types of learning, but according to Johnson it can also yield a much better result. Over the next four decades David W. Johnson would, together with his brother and colleagues would release countless articles, books and reviews on how to use constructive controversy in both decision making and for instructional purposes.

Explanation of Concept

The basis of the concept is to have two opposing sides debating each other, from the preordained viewpoint they received in the beginning. This means that some team-members might be debating from a viewpoint they do not share, and this is what makes constructive controversy an interesting concept. By debating from a viewpoint one does not share, the possibility of becoming more open-minded of the subject is there. It will help the participants of the exercise to put one-self into another persons shoes, and thus brighting ones own horizon.

Step by Step Guide

Discussion

References

1. ↑ http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/378410/methodic-doubt
2. ↑ http://www.brighthubpm.com/resource-management/84309-the-concept-of-constructive-controversy/
3. ↑ http://books.google.dk/books?id=rw61VDID7U4C&pg=PA90&lpg=PA90&dq=thomas+jefferson+constructive+controversy&source=bl&ots=zcgoo-tqRo&sig=caLuvAi6w2FLSnam79PLIXWyzzM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=SBZrVPiLHaXCywOGzYHYBQ&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=thomas%20jefferson%20constructive%20controversy&f=false
4. ↑ http://books.google.dk/books?id=rw61VDID7U4C&pg=PA90&lpg=PA90&dq=thomas+jefferson+constructive+controversy&source=bl&ots=zcgoo-tqRo&sig=caLuvAi6w2FLSnam79PLIXWyzzM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=SBZrVPiLHaXCywOGzYHYBQ&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=thomas%20jefferson%20constructive%20controversy&f=true page 69
5. ↑ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_W._Johnson_(scholar)#Constructive_controversy