System Readiness Level Index
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | The System Readiness Level (SRL) index is an index of maturity applied at the system-level concept with the objective of correlating this indexing to appropriate systems engineering management principals. The SRL of a given system is a function of individual TRLs and the maturities of the links between them, which will be defined based on a scale of integration readiness levels (IRLs). | ||
+ | The resulting function of this interaction is then correlated to a five level SRL index. This SRL index is defined by the current state of development of a system in relation to the DoD’s Phases of Development for the Life Cycle Management Framework <ref>''Dod Directive 5000.1, Department of Defense, 2005. '' </ref>. | ||
Line 4: | Line 6: | ||
===NASA=== | ===NASA=== | ||
===DoD=== | ===DoD=== | ||
− | + | ||
<ref>''From TRL to SRL: The Concept of Systems Readiness Levels, B. Sauser Et al., 2006.'' </ref> | <ref>''From TRL to SRL: The Concept of Systems Readiness Levels, B. Sauser Et al., 2006.'' </ref> | ||
<ref>''A Quantitative Analysis of System Readiness Level Plus (SRL+): Development of Readiness Level Measurement, N. Marlyana Et al., 2018.'' </ref> | <ref>''A Quantitative Analysis of System Readiness Level Plus (SRL+): Development of Readiness Level Measurement, N. Marlyana Et al., 2018.'' </ref> |
Revision as of 13:08, 14 February 2021
The System Readiness Level (SRL) index is an index of maturity applied at the system-level concept with the objective of correlating this indexing to appropriate systems engineering management principals. The SRL of a given system is a function of individual TRLs and the maturities of the links between them, which will be defined based on a scale of integration readiness levels (IRLs). The resulting function of this interaction is then correlated to a five level SRL index. This SRL index is defined by the current state of development of a system in relation to the DoD’s Phases of Development for the Life Cycle Management Framework [1].
Contents |