System Readiness Level Index: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5 | |5 | ||
| | |Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
===IRL=== | ===IRL=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: left;" | |||
|- | |||
|Level | |||
|IRL Definition | |||
|- | |||
|7 | |||
|The integration of technologies has been verified and validated with sufficient detail to be actionable | |||
|- | |||
|6 | |||
|The integrating technologies can accept, translate, and structure information for its intended application | |||
|- | |||
|5 | |||
|There is sufficient control between technologies neccesary to establish, manage, and terminate the integration | |||
|- | |||
|4 | |||
|There is sufficient detail in the quality and assuranceof the integration between technologies | |||
|- | |||
|3 | |||
|There is compatibility between technologies to orderly and efficiently integrate and interact | |||
|- | |||
|2 | |||
|There is some level of specificity to characterize the interaction between technolgoies through their interface | |||
|- | |||
|1 | |||
|An interface between technologies has been identified with sufficient detail to allow characterization of the relationship | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
<math> | <math> | ||
Revision as of 20:42, 21 February 2021
Background And Purpose
Preliminary Metrics
TRL
| Level | TRL Definition |
| 9 | Actual system proven through succesful mission operations |
| 8 | Actual system completed and qualified through test and demonstration |
| 7 | System prototype demonstration in relevant environment |
| 6 | System/Subsystem model or prototype demonstration in relevant environment |
| 5 | Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment |
| 4 | Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment |
| 3 | Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof-of-concept |
| 2 | Technology concept and/or application formulated |
| 1 | Basic principals observed and reported |
<math>
[TRL]_{\text{nx1}}=
\begin{pmatrix}
TRL_1 \\
TRL_2 \\
... \\
TRL_n
\end{pmatrix}
</math>
IRL
| Level | IRL Definition |
| 7 | The integration of technologies has been verified and validated with sufficient detail to be actionable |
| 6 | The integrating technologies can accept, translate, and structure information for its intended application |
| 5 | There is sufficient control between technologies neccesary to establish, manage, and terminate the integration |
| 4 | There is sufficient detail in the quality and assuranceof the integration between technologies |
| 3 | There is compatibility between technologies to orderly and efficiently integrate and interact |
| 2 | There is some level of specificity to characterize the interaction between technolgoies through their interface |
| 1 | An interface between technologies has been identified with sufficient detail to allow characterization of the relationship |
<math> [IRL]_{\text{nxn}}= \begin{pmatrix} IRL_{11} & IRL_{12} & ... & IRL_{1n} \\ IRL_{21} & IRL_{22} & ... & IRL_{2n} \\ ... & ... & ... & ... \\ IRL_{n1} & IRL_{n2} & ... & IRL_{nn} \\ \end{pmatrix} </math>
System Readiness Metrics
Component SRL
<math> Component SRL_i=\frac{SRL_i}{m_i} </math>
Composite SRL
<math> Composite SRL=\frac{(\frac{SRL_1}{m_1})+(\frac{SRL_2}{m_2})+...+(\frac{SRL_i}{m_i})}{n} </math>
SRL
| Level | SRL Definition |
| 9 | System has achieved initial operational capability and can satisfy mission objectives |
| 8 | System interoperability should have been demonstrated in an operational environment |
| 7 | System threshold capability should have been demonstrated at operational performance level |
| 6 | System component integrability shouldhave been validated |
| 5 | System high-risk component technology development should have been defined and the vaseline has been allocated |
| 4 | System performance specifications and constraints should have been defined and the baseline has been allocated |
| 3 | System high-risk immature technologies have been indetified and prototyped |
| 2 | System materiel solution should have been considered |
| 1 | System alternative materiel solutions should have been considered |
<math>
[SRL]_{\text{nx1}}=[IRL]_{\text{nxn}}*[TRL]_{\text{nx1}}
</math>
<math>
\begin{pmatrix}
SRL_1 \\
SRL_2 \\
... \\
SRL_n
\end{pmatrix}
=
\begin{pmatrix}
IRL_{11} & IRL_{12} & ... & IRL_{1j} \\
IRL_{21} & IRL_{22} & ... & IRL_{2j} \\
... & ... & ... & ... \\
IRL_{i1} & IRL_{i2} & ... & IRL_{ij} \\
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix} TRL_1 \\ TRL_2 \\ ... \\ TRL_i \end{pmatrix} </math>
The 3-Step SRA Process
Understand And Bound The System
Decompose And Map System
Perform Iterative Evaluations
| TRL | IRL | Composite SRL_i | Mean | Composite SRL_i Range | SRL |
| 9 | 9 | 1.000 | 0.914 - 1.000 | 9 | |
| 8 | 8 | 0.828 | 0.914 | 0.750 - 0.913 | 8 |
| 7 | 7 | 0.672 | 0.750 | 0.601 - 0.749 | 7 |
| 6 | 6 | 0.530 | 0.601 | 0.467 - 0.600 | 6 |
| 5 | 5 | 0.404 | 0.467 | 0.349 - 0.466 | 5 |
| 4 | 4 | 0.293 | 0.349 | 0.245 - 0.348 | 4 |
| 3 | 3 | 0.197 | 0.245 | 0.157 - 0.244 | 3 |
| 2 | 2 | 0.116 | 0.157 | 0.084 - 0.156 | 2 |
| 1 | 1 | 0.051 | 0.084 | 0.000 - 0.083 | 1 |