Reference class forecasting
(→Big Idea) |
(→Limitation) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Lastly, based on the degree of tolerance for the risk we decide what quantity of the optimism uplift would be needed to account for bias in cost and time estimates | Lastly, based on the degree of tolerance for the risk we decide what quantity of the optimism uplift would be needed to account for bias in cost and time estimates | ||
| − | + | RCF is not a new tool within the decision-making framework for mega infrastructure projects. However, its application to other fields is rare due to the lack of data on relevant reference classes or faulty information. The accuracy of the result generated by applying the RCF depends greatly on the sample size of the reference classes and the relevance of the reference class. Thus, if the reference classes were chosen poorly the forecasting result will give invalid results. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | RCF is not a new tool within the decision-making framework for | + | Last but not least, the RCF method is more convenient in cases where errors are due to non-random events such as human bias in decision making while uncertainty is present. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | The | + | |
==Annotated Bibliography== | ==Annotated Bibliography== | ||
Revision as of 23:16, 21 February 2021
Contents |
Abstract
The definition of project success according to the standard published by the project management institute is meeting customers' expectations without exceeding the desired requirement such as cost, duration, and scope. [1] However, executing projects on time following a planned framework and budget is a challenging aspect of project management. Reference class forecasting is a method that studies the overall view of certain projects by forecasting similar projects rather than focusing solely on the considered project. This method allows a project manager to avoid errors by basing the forecast on similar projects. It also assists to take decisions under uncertainties through assessing the risk of the planned project. [1] In this article, the RCFM method developed by Kahneman and Tversky will be presented. That will be followed with clear guidance on how to use the method. Then its application and limitations.
Big Idea
Optimism bias is a term coined by Daniel Kahnemann means that people tend to see the world in a more positive light. Optimism bias is the foundation of the RCF method, the method states that human judgment is biased, as it tends to be more optimistic than realistic due to overconfidence which leads to underestimating cost, completion times, and risks of planned actions. Furthermore, humans also tend to overestimate the benefits of those same actions. Research made on a sample of 250 large projects executed over the last 7 decades shows that 90% of these projects exceeded the original budget and duration planes. According to re-searcher, almost all projects do not deliver the intended promises [2]. The potential causes of the poor performance for projects have been categorized into three areas: Technical, political and economic, and psychological. Bent Flyvbjerg has found that basing forecasts on similar projects to the one on hand gives an estimate free from psychological biases. [3]
One method that is being used in infrastructure projects is Reference Class forecasting. [4] The reference class forecast provided an external point of view and act as an enabler of better planning based on historical data of projects that have similar attributes. By doing so, the project managers can reduce bias that is caused due to assessing available information "inside views" and neglecting unknown unknowns or other considerations "outside views".[5] RCFM is recommended by the American Planning Association which “encourages planners to use reference class forecasting in addition to traditional methods as a way to improve accuracy“. [5] The RCF attempts to fit a certain event into a probability of distribution of comparable class reference. Furthermore, this method of enhancing decision-making in light of un-certainties has proved to be effective. It allows for adjustments to be made in the original cost-benefit analysis (CBA) so the plan includes margin errors. [6]
Implementation
RCFM requires a large amount of work and should be implemented before initiating a project in order to get a unique opportunity on reflecting on the budget and planned duration. Implementing the RCFM requires a three-step approach, these steps are shown in figure 1 and explained thoroughly in the text below.
- Identify a reference class that has similar attributes to the project on hand. There is no role of thumbs when choosing a reference class. However, the reference class can not be narrow to get a reliable result if the categories were too small. The reference class can not be too wide either. Furthermore, the organization must also decide whether they want to create reference classes based on their projects within the programs or do they want to include reference classes from other organizations. [3]
- Determine a probability of distribution for the chosen reference classes. This requires trustful historical data from several projects within the reference class. The result of the probability distribution of the historical data will be used to estimate the level of uncertainty. From a statistical perspective, regression models are an essential tool in deriving the probability distribution
- Comparing the project on hand with the reference class distribution in order to determine the desired outcome such as budget and project duration.[5]
Lastly, based on the degree of tolerance for the risk we decide what quantity of the optimism uplift would be needed to account for bias in cost and time estimates
RCF is not a new tool within the decision-making framework for mega infrastructure projects. However, its application to other fields is rare due to the lack of data on relevant reference classes or faulty information. The accuracy of the result generated by applying the RCF depends greatly on the sample size of the reference classes and the relevance of the reference class. Thus, if the reference classes were chosen poorly the forecasting result will give invalid results.
Last but not least, the RCF method is more convenient in cases where errors are due to non-random events such as human bias in decision making while uncertainty is present.
Annotated Bibliography
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 "https://app-knovel-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/web/toc.v/cid:kpGPMBKP02/viewerType:toc/root_slug:viewerType%3Atoc/url_slug:root_slug%3Aguide-project-management?kpromoter=federation/A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE"
- ↑ "https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164032000080494a /What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects?"
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 "https://www.apm.org.uk/news/de-risking-the-programme-portfolio-with-reference-class-forecasting//De-risking the programme portfolio with reference class forecasting"
- ↑ "https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324337008_Implementation_of_the_Reference_Class_Forecasting_Method_for_Projects_Implemented_in_a_Chemical_Industry_Company/Implementation of the Reference Class Forecasting Method for Projects Implemented in a Chemical Industry Company"
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/968761468141298118/pdf/wps3781.pdf/Policy and Planning for Large Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures"
- ↑ "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116301162/Managing the cost overrun risks of hydroelectric dams: An application of reference class forecasting techniques"
