Net Present Value (NPV)
Written by Deepthi Tharaka Parana Liyanage Don- s203116
Financial appraisal is a method used to evaluate the viability of a proposed project or portfolio of investment projects by evaluating the benefits and costs that result from its execution. Investment decisions of the management are critical to a company since it decides the future of the company. This article discusses the Net Present Value (NPV) method which is widely used in financial appraisal. NPV is a dynamic financial appraisal method that considers the time value of money by applying discounting and compounding of all payment series during the investment period[1]. In simple terms, the net present value is the difference between an investment object’s incoming and outgoing payments at present time. NPV is determined by calculating the outgoing cashflows (costs) and incoming cash flows (benefits) for each period of an investment. After the cash flow for each period is calculated, the present value (PV) of each one is achieved by discounting its future value using the suitable discount rate. Net Present Value is the cumulative value of all the discounted future cash flows[2].
Firstly, this article discusses the idea behind the Net Present Value method. Then this introduces the NPV calculation method[1] and describes the importance of the variables in the formula such as discount rate. Also, it highlights the decision criteria behind NPV and explains it with a real-life application. Finally, it critically reflects on the limitations of this method and briefly introduces the other alternative financial apprisal methods such as Internal Rate of Return (IRR), payback method, and Return on Investment (ROI).
Contents |
Big Idea
Project business case development is a critical point in a project where it uses to obtain the approval for investment in the project by presenting the benefits, cost, and risk associated with alternative options and the method of selecting the preferred solution. In a business case, financial appraisal plays a key role to answer the fundamental economic questions of whether an investment should be made and which project should be chosen among a selection of different alternatives. Because the task of financial appraisal is to predict the financial effects of planned investment and to present the data in such a way that a reasoned investment decision can be reached[1]. The net present value (NPV) method is the most frequently used approach in the financial appraisal of a project.
What is NPV?
Net Present Value (NPV) is the present value of the future net cash flows of an investment project. In simple terms, the net present value (NPV) is the difference between the present value of all future incoming cash flows and the present value of all future outgoing cash flows. NPV is a widely used method in the financial appraisal that has the following benefits :
- Reflects the return on capital investments in the best and clearest way.
- Shows the present value of money, taking account of the effect of the time factor expressed in the form of the discount rate.
- Uses the entire life cycle of an investment project in calculations, taking account of cash flows generated in different periods of time.
- Additive feature of the indicator (possibility to sum the NPV of individual projects to evaluate the project portfolio) enables evaluation of projects requiring multiple investments.
Time value of money
Time value of money means that a sum of money is worth more now than the same sum of money in the future. That is because the money you have now can use it to make more money by running a business, buying something now and selling it later for more, or simply putting it in the bank and earning interest. Money can grow only through investing and investment delay is an opportunity cost where not having the money right now also includes the loss of additional income, which could be earned by simply having cash earlier. [invest-change]Future money is also less valuable because inflation erodes its buying power. Moreover, receiving money in the future rather than now may involve some risk and uncertainty regarding its recovery. For these reasons, future cash flows are worth less than the present cash flows. NPV assesses the profitability of a given project on the basis that cash flow in the future is not worth the same as a cash flow today. The time value of money is recognized in NPV by applying discounting or/and compounding to all payment series during the investment period[3].
Formula
The following formula use these common variables [1]:
– Present Value
- time of the cashflow
- Cash inflows in period t
– Cash outflows in period t
=
– Net cashflow in period t
– Investment in t=0
– Liquidation proceeds in t=n
– The discount rate
– Total number of periods
In order to consider the time value of money the net present value method considers the value of an investment at the present time by converting all information of the future into a key figure at the time today. This projection of the value that a future cash flow has in the present is called "present value" (PV).
To get the Present value (PV) of a future net cash flow in period t, they are discounted using discount rate(i):
Net present value combines these projections of net cash flows to assess the overall value of a project from the present view. In simple terms, The net present value is calculated from the difference of the present value of all future incoming cash flows(revenues/benefits) and the present value of all future outgoing cash flows(costs).
The net present value is given by:
The difference between the cash inflows and cash outflows gives the net cash flow
of the corresponding period. For normal investments which are characterized by initial investment
, discounting of the expected net cash flows
to t = 0 achieves comparability with the initial investment
. Subtracting the initial investment outlay
from the present value of the net cash flows gives the net present value (NPV). If a possible final payment
for the liquidation of the investment in t = n is also considered, the calculation of the net present value can formally be written as follows:
As a summary, the following steps are recommended for the calculation of the Net present value[1]:
- Determination of the initial investment
.
- Estimate the expected net cash flows
from the investment for each period of the planning horizon.
- Determination of the discount uniform rate
(it is assumed that the discount rate remains unchanged over the life of the investment), in other words, the rate of return required by the investor.
- Determination of the present value through discounting of the expected net cash flows
with the discount rate to the time period when the investment is made.
- Subtraction of the initial investment
from the present value. This yields the net present value (NPV).
Note that this specification also allows the possible incorporation of payments from earlier periods and time periods t < 0 can also be considered. The discount factor 1/(1 + i)t is automatically converted into a compounding factor and the final value of all cash flows which occur before time 0 is correctly assessed in t = 0[1].
Other NPV Formula
NPV of an annuity
If the net cash inflows are uniform and equidistant and occur at the end of each period, the series of net cash flows can be interpreted as an annuity [1]. The payments or receipts occur at the end of each period for an ordinary annuity while they occur at the beginning of each period for an annuity due. Using the formula for the present value of an ordinary annuity, it follows that[1]:
NPV of a perpetuity
For the special case that is considered as perpetuity, which is given for an infinite and constant stream of identical cash flows the NPV can be expressed as follows[1]:
Discount Rate
The discount rate is the rate of return used to determine the present value of future cash flows in net present value calculation. The discount rate is a crucial component in determining NPV and the selection of discount rate will be company-specific as it is related to how the company gets its funds. Investments are financed using equity and/or debt and different costs of capital exist. If an investment is financed exclusively with equity, the discount rate can be derived from an alternative return available in the capital markets (cost of equity) or the average return of a similar investment object. Investments that are exclusively debt-financed can be assessed using the cost of debt to discount the net cash flows. If an investment relies on both equity and debt financing, the discount rate is the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and can be calculated as weighted average of cost of equity and cost of debt. The weighted average cost of capital is often used in companies as the discount rate and it can be interpreted as the minimum rate of return that the investor demands for his activities. This is also commonly called the “hurdle rate” because for an enterprise to be profitable it has to earn a return greater than the cost of capital. [1].
However, it is appropriate to use higher discount rates to reflect other factors such as risk, opportunity cost of money invested in the infrastructure and etc [2]. An NPV calculated using variable discount rates (if they are known for the duration of the investment) may better reflect the situation than one calculated from a constant discount rate for the entire investment duration [1].
Also, it is important to highlight that the NPV depends on the choice about the discount rate, and on the time span considered by the analysis. The choice of the discount rate can dramatically change the net present value since the NPV is an inverse function of the discount rate (i). Higher the discount rate, the smaller the net present value. The time period of analysis influences the NPV because projects, in general, impose a negative cash flow in the first years and positive cash flows only sometime after its entering into operation, a longer period of analysis includes a bigger number of fiscal years with a positive cash flows than a shorter period of analysis [2].
Decision rule
Net present value is used to assess the attractiveness of the investment and it shows how much value an investment or project adds to the firm. If the Net Present Value (NPV) is positive (NPV > 0), it means that the benefits deriving from the project exceed the costs, then the project deserves to be done. The opposite happens if the NPV is negative (NPV < 0). If NPV = 0, it means that the project is not able to increase the value of the company and in this situation it is a better choice to avoid going on with the project [2].
Condition | Idea | Decision |
---|---|---|
If NPV > 0 | Investment increase the value (profit) of the company in the amount of the net present value. | Investment can be made. |
If NPV = 0 | The investment just returns the cost of capital. No increase or decrease in wealth results. | This project adds no monetary value. Difficult to get the decision whether to accept or reject the project. Decision should be based on other criteria. |
If NPV < 0 | An implementation would destroy value (profit) in an amount equal to the negative NPV. | The investment can be turned down. |
The following two profitability criteria must be met for the economic viability of an investment[2]:
Absolute profitability: The Net Present Value of an investment option must be positive or at least zero (NPV≥ 0).
Relative profitability: The option with the highest positive NPV is the most profitable and usually the preferred option, provided that the investment risk is the same. Note that the net present values of different options can only be compared if their lifetime is the same.
Applications
Calculation of Present value
For example, if a project is expected to receive $5,000 with 10% discount rate after 4 years, its present value (PV) can be calculated as:
Calculation of Net Present Value
A company decides to invest $100,000 for a project which is expected to give the following cash flows. The discount rate is 10%.
Now | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial Investment | $100,000 | |||
Running costs | $60,000 | $90,000 | $90,000 | |
Revenues | $80,000 | $100,000 | $120,000 | |
Liquidation proceeds | $140,000 |
Using NPV formula,
Since NPV > 0, this project can be invested.
Calculation of Net Present Value of an annuity
A company decides to invest $100,000 for a project which is expected to give the following cash flows. The discount rate is 10%.
Now | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial Investment | $100,000 | |||
Net cash flows | $60,000 | $60,000 | $60,000 | |
Liquidation proceeds | $140,000 |
Using NPV of an annuity formula,
Since NPV> 0, the project can be invested.
Calculation of Net Present Value of a perpetuity
A company decides to invest $100,000 for a project which is expected to give a net cash flow of $60,000 in perpetuity with a discount rate of 10%.
Using The NPV of a perpetuity formula,
Since NPV> 0, the project can be invested.
As per the above equation, (1+r) n is called the future value factor. There are pre-defined tables that specify the rate of interest and its value after ‘n’ number of years. It can also be utilized with the help of a calculator or an excel spreadsheet as well. The below snapshot is an instance of how the rate is calculated for different interest rates and at different time intervals.
Limitations
- NPV calculation is based on several estimates such as future cash flows and discount rate, therefore there is a high chance for errors that can drastically affect the end result of the calculation. Since every project has a unique set of processes there is lots of room for errors in estimating cash flows and the actual figures can have great variance. NPV often takes an optimistic approach to future cash flow calculations by overestimating benefits (incoming cashflows) and underestimating costs (outgoing cashflows). On the other hand, Investment decisions based on the NPV method are highly sensitive to the selected discount rate. Using a discount rate that is too low will make suboptimal investments and using too high will result in rejecting good investments. Moreover, the NPV is calculated based on the assumption that the discount rate remains the same throughout the life of the project. However, it does not account for the fluctuation of discount rates according to the market situation [4].
- The NPV is expressed in absolute terms rather than a relative term. Therefore it does not useful for comparing projects of different sizes as the largest projects typically generate the highest returns [4]. The size of the NPV output is determined mostly by the size of the input (cite article). A higher NPV doesn't necessarily mean a better investment. If there are two investments or projects up for decision, and one project is larger in scale, the NPV will be higher for that project as NPV is reported absolute terms and a larger investment will result in a larger NPV number. It is important to assess the returns from an investment in percentage terms to get an accurate picture of which investment provides a better return.
- It does not consider the non-cash benefits generated from a project into consideration while making decisions. NPV method is purely quantitive in nature and does not consider qualitative factors. Some elements of the costs and benefits of the projects are not quantitative, so there is great difficulty in taking them into consideration. NPV method gives financial feasibility of different projects, but often, other qualitative factors exist that must be considered.
- NPV calculation omits hidden costs such as opportunity costs and organizational costs.
Alternative financial appraisal methods
This section gives a brief idea about other methods
- IRR
- payback
- ROI
Annotated Bibliography
Reference Example: The book-1.[1] The book-2.[2] The book-3.[3] The book-4.[5] The book-5.[6] The research paper-1.[4]
Häcker J. and Ernst D., Ch. 8 - Investment Appraisal. In: Financial Modeling. Global Financial Markets(2017), pp.343-384
The investment appraisal chapter in Financial modeling book by Häcker J. and Ernst D. introduces the concept of investment appraisal and provides a good overview of methods and approaches in investment management. The book introduces the static & dynamic approaches of investment appraisal and provide a comprehensive discussion on different methods under each approach & describe why dynammic approaches such as NPV, IRR are superior than the static approaches like payback. The writers introduce the net present value as one of the main methods of dynamic approach and it clearly describes the NPV calculation method and the importance of underlying variables of NPV formula. The book was the ideal source to provide a good explanation of the concept of financial appraisal, the concept of NPV, how to calculate NPV & its applications. Also, this was useful to get idea about the other methods such as payback, IRR etc.
Ferrari, C., Bottasso, A., Conti, M. and Tei, A., Ch. 5 - Investment Appraisal. In: Economic role of transport infrastructure: Theory and models (2018), pp. 85-114
Chapter 5 of Economic role of transport infrastructure: Theory and models book by Ferrari, C., Bottasso, A., Conti, M. and Tei, A. introduce the importance of investment appraisal in large projects such as transport infrastructure. It critically highlights the different financial appraisal methods and it especially highlights the importance of Net present value in the context of large projects. Especially it points out the relationship of discount rate & time period with NPV and the importance of selecting the correct discount rate when the projects are appraised based on net present value. It provides different approaches to determine the discounting rates. This chapter also highlights the NPV calculation method & how to treat when project are mutually exclusive. Additionally it introduces the importance of performing sensitivity analysis when calculating NPV. This is a good reference to get overall picture behind the financial appraisal methods and its applications.
Poggensee K. and Poggensee J., Ch. 3 - Dynamic Investment Calculation Methods. In: Investment Valuation and Appraisal (2021), pp. 85-140
The book Investment Valuation and Appraisal by Poggensee K. and Poggensee J. was a useful reference to get a thorough idea about the appraisal of projects using different financial appraisal methods. Chapter 3 of this book introduces the dynamic investment appraisal methods such as net present value, Internal rate of return, annuity method, etc. It critically argues the assumptions of dynamic investment appraisal methods. It highlights the net present value as the most widely used method in the dynamic approach and introduces the NPV and discounting concepts. This was a good source to get the idea of discounting where projecting the future net cashflows into present time and NPV calculations based on different scenarios such as annuity, perpetuity etc.
References
- ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 Häcker J. and Ernst D., Ch. 8 - Investment Appraisal. In: Financial Modeling. Global Financial Markets, (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2017), pp. 343-384, https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42658-1_8
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Ferrari, C., Bottasso, A., Conti, M. and Tei, A., Ch. 5 - Investment Appraisal. In: Economic role of transport infrastructure: Theory and models, (Elsevier, 2018), pp. 85-114, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-03558-1
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Konstantin P. and Konstantin M., Ch. 4 - Investment Appraisal Methods. In: Power and Energy Systems Engineering Economics, (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 39-64, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72383-9_4
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Bora, B., Comparison between net present value and internal rate of return, International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing, (2015), 5(12), pp.61-71
- ↑ Poggensee K. and Poggensee J., Ch. 3 - Dynamic Investment Calculation Methods. In: Investment Valuation and Appraisal, (Springer, Cham, 2021), pp. 85-140, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62440-8
- ↑ Ing E. and Lester A., Ch. 6 - Investment Appraisal. In: Project Management, Planning and Control. 7th Edition, (Elsevier, 2017), pp. 29-36, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102020-3.00006-1